Technology

57997 readers

3140 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

108

Will Microsoft drop the TPM requirement for Win 11 once Win 12 rolls around? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by Adequately_Insane@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

212 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Or maybe they will launch Win 12 with optional TPM support.

Imho making the OS(es) TPM only cannot be good for their business, many people are still on Win 10 with no intention to switch, since their motheboard does not support TPM and do not want to upgrade PC / waste PCI-E slot on TPM extension.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 54 points 9 months ago (81 children)

After using Windows for 30+ years now (since Windows 1), this is one of the straws finally pushing me into Linux.

I'm running 10, but without a TPM, can't go to 11. So sad. Not.

Honestly 7 was the last decent OS they made. In my opinion the good OS's were NT4 (game changer), 2000, XP, 7. They can keep the rest.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (5 children)

You can use the Rufus USB flashing tool with the Windows 11 iso and it will remove the TPM requirement and others.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rufus is the shit, love Rufus.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah I have windows 11 on multiple computers without secure boot or tpm enabled

[–] Apothecary@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

This breaks your ability to get security updates on win11 though right?

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Oh that's neat. Thanks!

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

But then you’ve got Windows 11… shudder

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Toes@ani.social 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

3.1 and 98se were pretty decent at the time too.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yea, 3.11 was a significant change. It was still just dos with a shell.

A usable shell, which was quite new for the time.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean 98se? 3.11 was more than a shell with all the updates. It had a 32bit preemptive subsystem.

95 was 3.11 with a good gui. At release there were better guis for 3.11 than 95's like Pubtech and Norton Desktop.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (79 replies)