this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
158 points (96.5% liked)
Games
16681 readers
888 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But it's not like Huawei needed 10 to 15 years to catch up to the then-current state of technology as everybody claimed. So no, not "a long way to go".
What are we going to do to counter it, bomb their facilities? We were convenient but they don't need us. We can't stall their progress without starting a war.
My point is there isn't much between them. They already have one of the biggest chip making industries and they already bought the stuff to move forward.
What can we do?
If a large chunk of their production is exported the market could be influenced to reduce the amount they can export, such as expanding US chip production to replace Chinese imports. Then their industries would be less profitable and have to spend time scaling down to meet the lower demand, which would also reduce their capacity to develop.
I think that fits between one extreme and another?