this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
489 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

58315 readers
4518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 226 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They could easily pay those workers by terminating the contract with Rogan

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 118 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

They also bought Michelle Obama and Duke&Duchess of Essex as podcasters. Not saying these are equivalent to Rogan, just that they seem to be burning money on things that has nothing to do with music. And I'm very much not a fan of fucking up podcasts as a simple medium delivered by RSS. I have a futile hope that that decision will burn them.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

if it's not available via RSS then it's not a podcast, it's an audio show.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're investing heavily in podcasts because podcasts are far, far more profitable than music. If they can get people used to (and hooked) on listening to podcasts (any podcasts) through Spotify then all that money spent on popular podcasters will be worth it (in the end).

I'm sure Spotify would love it if they could stop streaming music entirely and just focus on podcasts. Streaming music costs them a ton of money and overhead (bureaucracy associated with keeping track of and paying artists globally with bazillions of laws and regulations and fees to navigate) whereas podcasts just cost bandwidth.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I hate that you’re right. I listen to 0 podcast, it’s just not my format, yet they constantly push it in my face

[–] villainy@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

And I'm very much not a fan of fucking up podcasts as a simple medium delivered by RSS. I have a futile hope that that decision will burn them.

This was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. When they started locking up shows to their app, I cancelled my subscription and dropped Spotify entirely. I don't even listen to any of the shows they bought but I do listen to a lot of podcasts through Pocket Casts and take umbrage when anybody fucks with the standards.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Big tech used to be built on the idea that you could work on a moonshot idea, have it fail, and then be reassigned to something new, or swallowed into new orgs. This way, you could work on the next Zune, Fire Phone, or Circles, and not fear for your job - like you would if you worked for a startup.

Now, they don't give a fuck. If the moonshot fails, they move the exec to a new org, and fire the entire team. It means that companies like Spotify can diversify their offering while saving money, and due to the poor hiring market and general apathy of tech workers, they just deal with it.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 57 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think Joe was out of things to say 10 years ago. You could replace him with AI and never know the difference.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't think AI speaks "knuckledragger" well enough

[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're overestimating the intelligence and ability of his listeners if you think they'd notice the difference.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean if just once it sounded not stupid they'd be calling JR a "fag" or something, I think.

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I don’t hate the man like a lot of people here but this a really good point.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 10 months ago

The opposite. He never had anything to say, he was just a great interviewer.

The problem is he started believing he had something to say, and started talking over guests he disagrees with... The last one I watched the guest spoke for less than 2 minutes before Joe went on a 5+ minute rant about how he didn't believe it. I can't even remember what it was about, because the guy didn't even get to lay out his argument

We got it Joe, you think the world is a magical place and have strong opinions on how humans should interact. Let the science man talk

[–] grayman@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Uh... Ok... Wow. So you understand how businesses work?