this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
49 points (84.5% liked)

Apple

17241 readers
186 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Remember when Apple had to allow 3rd party payment systems and still legally imposed a 27% fee on 3rd party payments, along with reporting requirements, even though those payments had nothing to do with Apple?

Is it possible that Apple will “allow” 3rd party app stores but still require apps on those stores to pass Apple’s App Review? And will try to impose that 27% fee or something similar on both app sales and in-app purchases through 3rd party app stores.

Apps can’t run on iOS unless they are code signed by Apple and 3rd party app stores won’t change that.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

EU is not this dumb. DMA regulations are quite specific in what’s expected of tech giants. They’ll try to delay but in the end non-compliance will cost them.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Exactly. With the USB-C ruling, they explicitly made it so that other shenanigans like "you can only use original Apple USB-C cables" would not be allowed. They know companies will try everything legally possible to bend the rules.

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

This happened in the Netherlands and the authority didn’t seem to think the 27% “commission” was a problem. Hopefully Brussels has a better-designed regulation.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is how I see it going. Alternative app stores will be available but apps will still need to be reviewed and signed by Apple. The alternative app store will be required to pay Apple for the privilege.

Unsigned side loads will never be permitted on Apple devices.