this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
267 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

55940 readers
3959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Binance was slapped with a $4.3 billion fine because it let groups like Hamas and ISIS receive funds: Treasury Department::"Can barely buy an AK-47 with 600 bucks," a Binance compliance staffer told his boss in 2019, per regulators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

laughs in less than two weeks of pentagon funding

For what it’s worth I agree with you, but the money we spend on many agencies is wild

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Haha yes, the Pentagon has probably "lost" more money than the totality of all fines.

It's just an idea I had, rather than directly spending out of a budget it would be a way to be self sustaining. If there is no wrongdoing then by its nature the funding would dry up and be self-cancelling. On the other hand it could generate further revenue if allowed to continue investigating.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The problem is that the auditors will ALWAYS find wrongdoing, even if it doesn’t exist. If their funding (and therefore their jobs) depend on fines on offending organizations, then everyone is getting found to be fraudulent

[–] stifle867@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago

That's definitely a real problem that would need to be considered. I'm sure it has been in great length. My gut feeling says it's workable though and the problem being more political than technical.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m in full agreement. Crypto was touted as this “untraceable currency” and, surprise, it became used for nefarious means. We need more regulation on this stuff, not less, because as much as the “everyday joe” who got into crypto “because his nephew taught him about it” doesn’t want the government spying on him, really it’s massive fund transfers and money laundering for bad actors that it seems to benefit the most.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Especially once you've been found or pleaded guilty. If a person commits a crime of this magnitude and they go to jail, they would have probation upon release. Maybe there should be some kind of corporate probation policy? Not something up for negotiation.