this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
986 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

34819 readers
97 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is this just the cost per raw Watt produced?

Is it a fair comparison vs conventional fuel-based power (coal/nuclear)?

Ie: if you wanted to build a plant capable of producing continuously, 24 hours a day, you would need some multiple of solar panels to produce an excess during daylight, and storage.

Not that drastic drops in solar costs aren’t bad, just what would the cost-per-watt be if you had to power an average city on just solar for a year?

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Look at the subtitle on the chart, it's levelized cost over the generator's lifetime. So not including storage for any intermittent source like solar or wind

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And not including the financing cost of buying up an this upfront.

I'm buying 36kWh solar array and it will be home made diy, used.parts and maximum jank and don't paid upfront because that's the only way it makes economic sense and that's hoping it works for more than 7 years (break even point at my insolation level and and grid price (8.8$cad/kWh) and it only works with net metering)

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Levelized cost averages the fixed costs over the lifetime of the generation

They're generally comparing utility scale installations, not home rooftop solar though.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In my area, you don't get any government incentives unless it is professionally installed. They get you coming and going.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, I never even considered the subsidies, I know it's not for me.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anybody can claim the tax credit though. When you file the taxes it's a box you enter a number into.

They don't ask for proof, but you'd better keep your receipts just in case.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hmmmm, interesting. Thanks.

[–] corship@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

Well you'll never get a "fair" comparison, because the environmental effects are never properly priced into the consumer price.