this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Open Source

30284 readers
542 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
31
HyperbolaBSD (hyperbola.info)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
 

FSF approved distro (now Linux based soon with own FLOSS-BSD-kernel)

Do you want to participate? (esp. BSD-kernel-dev would be very welcome ๐Ÿ˜)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

But you can use gnu/Linux without systemd, or hell, even without the gnu, Linux is just a kernel and has never been a unix philosophy following kernel, and neither is BSD afaik, they are both monolithic kernels. Not to mention that most currently existing BSD operating systems don't use old-school init scripts anyways, they either use openrc or are MacOS and use the literal predecessor of systemd...

[โ€“] Frato@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

That is true. There are linux distros around with musl/busybox (alpine) and some distros without systemd. But i would really appreciate a fsf-conform distro with a fsf-conform BSD-kernel and the bsd userland - it's just a nice addition to the existing oss-os world. It is not about "this OR that" - why not have both?

p.s. both runit and openrc are close enough to the unix philosophy

p.s.s. yes, macos derived from openBSD and is using a sytemd-like init, but - as said - macos mainly targets end-user system... it's o'right for that - i think power users prefer os-designs closer to the unix philosophy.

[โ€“] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't wanna sound like I'm hating on BSD, I'm not, I just don't see the point of parabola splitting their development efforts to develop another niche BSD-based operating system, instead of focusing on parabola gnu/Linux or hell, even contributing to pre-existing BSD-based projects like freebsd or openbsd

[โ€“] Frato@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

nevermind, parabola is a great distro (with openrc version), but hyperbola will not draw dev-power from pb, because it will be a completly own breed. Yes the existing BSD's are great, but none of them are fsf conform.

The effort of the hb-bsd will produce OSS that can synergize with all the projects you named.