Technology

55744 readers

2747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

593

Nepal decides to ban TikTok (kathmandupost.com)

submitted 7 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nepal decides to ban TikTok::A Cabinet meeting on Monday took the decision to ban the social media app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I got my information from the article about the new social media rules within that article here:

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2023/11/10/cabinet-passes-rules-to-regulate-social-media

the relevant passage:

The new rule also bars any post promoting wrong activities such as child labour, human trafficking, child marriage or polygamy.

so for nepal human trafficking and polygamy is in the same category of "wrong activities".

What do you mean its not the point? its literally a crime to post "vulgar" language, like you said a catch all term that they can use to censor anything they deem "vulgar". How is this not a law designed to censor?

For clarity, I am not the person you replied to, I wrote the comment above. Imo Usernames are a bit hard to see on some frontends!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

so for nepal human trafficking and polygamy is in the same category of “wrong activities”.

There's a substantive degree of overlap, particularly in parts of the world where young women are sold by desperate parents and criminal cartels for the pleasure of old perverts. This isn't Sam Bankman Fried and three if his closest money launderers in a sex pile. This is cloaking sex trafficking under the cover of marriage.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The law did not ban polyamory, it is already illegal in nepal, so there is no "cover of marriage" there. It banned posting pro poly posts online. That is pretty harsh. Just because criminals use it does not mean stating your opinion had to be banned!

The only explanation I can come up with is that they just banned a bunch of stuff the legislators deemed immoral. I dont know enough about nepal to say that with any certainty, but my hunch is that pro-poly messaging may have been banned because of the muslim minority.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

there is no “cover of marriage”

https://www.girlsnotbrides.org/learning-resources/child-marriage-atlas/atlas/nepal/

33%of Nepalese girls are married before their 18th birthday and 8% are married before the age of 15.

:-/

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Damn thats pretty dire. Apperently the nepali government is doing something about it, so good luck to them!

Anyway, this isnt relevant to the "cover of marriage" claim. That statistic is about marriage under 18, not polygamic marriage.