this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
117 points (87.7% liked)

Programming

16311 readers
173 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

170 Mb of unnecessary tagging

The guy in the blog says mb (millibits) and you say Mb (megabits). I was confused so I checked, and the page is 170MB (megabytes). I agree though, that's inefficient even for an intentionally inefficient idea.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

The guy in the blog says mb (millibits)

a) does anybody actualy use that? How many people reading this thread can say they've actually seen that in real use or used it?

b) I'm fairly convinced you knew what was meant because it's not like it's uncommon to use a minuscule m for "mega" in colloquial usage

Weird performative pedantry or a joke that flew over my head? I give about a 0.5 probability for both

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I was actually confused enough to have to check. I frequently work with memory, storage and bandwidth calculations so I'm always aware of the distinction between MB and Mb (and MiB, etc.), so I wondered whether "mb" was intentional, if weird.

[–] elint@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you really work with memory, storage, and bandwidth? If so, have you EVER run across an instance where memory, storage, or bandwidth were referred to in millibits? Memory, storage, and bandwidth are extremely important in my job, though not my direct focus, and I can say over 50 years as a sysadmin and coder, I have never encountered "mb" and had it actually mean "millibits". Literally not once. Now "Mb" definitely has some ambiguity (in bandwidth, it's used for Megabits, and in memory/storage, it's more often than not a typo of MB), but "mb" actually meaning "millibits"? No, friend. Just no.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, that's why it seemed weird.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seriously? :D You seriously considered the idea o bits - the smallest possible unit - to be divided into a thousand subunits? :D Get lost

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I didn't think it through. I think I had "kilo-" in mind. Sorry for being dumb.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)