If they can live there permanently, they're not homeless, are they? And that sounds surprisingly anti-capitalistic, almost like what this meme is talking about.

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Getting these people help makes sense from a capitalist perspective too, help them and they can work again and probably do a full life of that. It really isn't anti-capitalist.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they do, actually. At least in most countries...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then they're not homeless. If you have a place where you can live as long as you like, you have a home.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A shelter is not a residence

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is it not a residence if you can stay there indefinitely? That sounds like a residence to me. The Internet tells me that 'residence' means 'the place in which one lives; a dwelling.' If they don't ever have to leave, they live there.

[–] Smk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have to be fucking dumb. Get the fuck out. AcTuAlLy LoL ThE iNtErNeT blablabla. Do you really think a fucking chamber that you can only go to sleep is a fucking residence ? Are you a moron ?? Get an education dumb fuck.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blocked.

[–] Smk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'm 😭 😂😂

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So homeless people dont exist then? Because where I live, everybody could go to a shelter for as long as they like.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they don't live in a shelter indefinitely, yes. They are homeless.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

They could live in a shelter indefinitely...