this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
368 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1112 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, seems kind of scary that this implies a future where so many people are in prison that their vote could actually tip the balance ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] C_Leviathan@lemmy.ml 118 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Creating a class of prison slaves who have no right to vote with no possibility of upward mobility is a feature, not a bug. Add to that the difficulty of obtaining affordable healthcare/tying it to a job, gutting education, making child labor legal, making abortion illegal, etc., etc., and that plan becomes pretty obvious.

[–] pragmakist@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we be totally honest here and just state what the fear is?

If slaves could vote they'd vote for freedom.

There's a hole the size of a railroad junction in the 13nd amendment.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

There’s a hole the size of a railroad junction in the 13nd amendment.

It's less of a loophole and more of a loop-archway... with bright neon signs to advertise it.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

This. The whole thing is 100% by design, any other reasoning is a distraction created, again by design, to get us to look the other way.
Don't.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a recipe for creating monsters similar to how intervention in the middle east created those terrorists and their symbiotic relationship with the military industrial complex. That plan is so ridiculously evil and doomed to fail that I can't help but think there's some second order effect that they're going for here.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The monsters aren't the ones being created, the monsters are the ones creating those circumstances to begin with.

I know you didn't mean anything by it, but that shift in focus is really important to point out, because those same people rely on you and me to see the poor people who's lives they destroyed as the problem, instead of whose who really are.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of that changes the fact that it is the system that creates that kind of behaviour by encouraging and rewarding selfishness, greed, hate, and doing whatever it takes to "succeed".

I'm not denying that there are horrible people out there (I've been victim to a few personally), or that they shouldn't be held responsible for individual actions if they harm others (they should), but in almost all cases you can't blame them for turning out that way (again, not excusing any harm they go on to cause to others) when you look at the circumstances they need to exist in. Circumstances designed by a handful of people reaping unfathomable benefits.

So I'd much sooner point my finger at those who are actually to blame, instead of at those who are the fucked up products of their system, because one of those not only creates infinitely more damage than the other, but also it's only that same group that have the power to do anything to stop it.

[–] MythicWolf@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Begs the question of if the Stanford prison experiment ever really ended.