World News

32285 readers

912 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

jackmarxist@lemmy.ml

zephyreks@lemmy.ml

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml

471

Israel committing "textbook case of genocide," holocaust historian says (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"We're seeing the combination of genocidal acts with special intent," said Raz Segal, an Israeli historian.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All western news is doing some strong work completely ignoring coverage of this narrative. Absolute fucking disgrace and travesty.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're commenting on a newsweek article, a western news media with a readership of 100 million.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are not 100 million dentists offices. No way that is their readership.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They're referring to monthly unique visitors on the Newsweek website. Print circulation was around 100k in 2015. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsweek)

For comparison (I make no claims it's a good one), the New York Times web site has around 240 million monthly unique visitors. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times)

[–] UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does that include all the visitors blocked by their paywall?

Edit: I'm referring to NYT.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I only know what I gleaned from quick glance at their Wikipedia page, which says they have 8.6 million digital subscribers. So the 240 million figure includes non-subscribers who can run into paywalls, but I'm guessing the NYT might have some content that isn't paywalled, which complicates getting a sense of their 'reach'. Which is why I said I make no claims that it's a good comparison.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

and how many of those are bots?

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everything I'm reading is covering the Israeli war crimes and their condemnation from western countries. And it's mostly reporting from the west.

Maybe don't read for-profit journalism?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Everything I’m reading is covering the Israeli war crimes and their condemnation

Oh, you mean the slap-on-the-wrist heckling some liberals in the west are emanating? The Israelis must be shaking in their boots.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

It's not a condemnation at all. Look at the wording, it's phrased like whatever happens to the Palestinians is a natural disaster. A flooding or an earthquake.