this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1066 points (86.8% liked)

Memes

45887 readers
1327 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

PLACES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE DRIVEN TO

Says who? Is there some natural law when the universe was created that said mankind are not allowed to drive?

YEARS OF BUILDING CAR INFRASTRUCTURE yet NO DECREASE IN OVERALL TRAVEL TIME

Ok you go and set off on foot on a 200km journey, and a car sets off at the same time to get to the same place, who will get there first?

Want to go somewhere fast? We have a vehicle for that; It's called a "TRAIN"

Trains are great at moving people / goods between urban areas, but are awful (obviously) for point-to-point journeys. Want to the doctors fast? Can't exactly get on the the train directly outside your house to the front door of the doctors. I like trains, I use them where I can and always use them whenever I go into the office, but you cannot seriously suggest using trains to totally replace cars, it's so ridiculous that I'd swear you've never even seen one.

"i am DRIVING my...."

Not sure what's deranged about it? In fact that case is very valid as you're likely to have a lot of shopping (two weeks worth) that you'd really struggle to carry on public transport. It might have a bit more authenticity if you said it was just to get some bread and milk.


I get the sentiment, we should totally be trying to reduce our car usage and planning our urban environments to favour walking, cycling and public transport, but the fuckcars community on here are totally deranged. Your arguments look ridiculous and aren't going to convince anyone.

[โ€“] Tum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's a rehash of a meme about math it's not really making thee points in earnest.

[โ€“] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There does seem to be a high proportion of city dwellers wondering why somebody who lives four miles from the nearest shop that sells something more substantial than Budweiser and crisps would need a car...

[โ€“] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Was there ever any doubt that people who dislike cars live in walkable cities? They can't conceive that someone could live in another place that doesn't have the same infrastructure they do. The idea of being out in the middle of nowhere with 40 acres of land doesn't even cross their minds because to them everyone lives in an urban environment or should be able to make the same solutions work.

It's also weird that they classify getting groceries for two weeks as strange, like do you guys not have natural disasters? You just buy groceries for the next day? What do you do when the shelves go bare during things like Covid or a hurricane? I guess you turn into looters, since you apparently think planning for anything beyond the next day is "deranged." God forbid someone has some extra rice and beans to get through a period of logistics failure.