this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31462 readers
729 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most servers are not able to access the Google API.

Invidious report of the same(ish) problem: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious/issues/4045#issuecomment-1674373088

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not to be a downer but... how did people not anticipate this happening? Google is likely going to do everything they can to shut down non-official clients like Piped, since they're sidestepping all of YouTube's revenue streams. Hopefully they don't take the nuclear option and somehow lock down the API and make it much harder to download videos via tools like yt-dlp.

[–] BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well, if they implement their web integrity DRM thingy in Chrome and Youtube then that will prevent anything that's not a real approved browser from accessing the website, and with that the video streams. Not only Piped/Newpipe, but anything automated trying to access any website will be automatically locked out unless the website approves of it. New search engine bot? Archiving crawlers? Any type of third party program that accesses some website's content without approval? Dead.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah we're basically hurting their revenue by using Piped and other ways to bypass Google's ads. They wouldn't be profitable if everyone stopped watching those ads

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Noooooooooo! The poor google 😢

their $412,378/s has been reduced to $412,367/s! 😭 😭

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, they should provide thousands of gigiabits of video streaming to everyone for free. It's our right!

[–] lemmy@lemmy.stonansh.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not for free. They use your data. Also most of these 'free' videos are made by enthusiasts.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Enthusiasts who want to earn money off the platform, yes.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they've achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what I'm saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what's your point?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

That's there's not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don't understand your point now.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

As a contributor who doesn't monetize videos, you don't speak for everyone.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It amazes me how entitled these Internet hippies are nowadays. You can't expect someone to provide such a huge service for free. If you don't like ads, pay for it. It's like $5 per month when you pay as a group..

[–] wifepimp4smokes@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

They make enough money off the rubes. They should just let us nerds have this one.

I would pay if

  1. Google promised not collect any data but now you would pay and have your data collected.

  2. I just want load my subscription feed and they are all there not hidden away.

  3. Hid shorts or have them on separate tab.

  4. Bonus would be if related videos where acutely related videos in time span. Not the mess they are now.

Also why would I have to pay YouTube music? I don’t want that.

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not going to be popular saying this but how is the service supposed to survive without a revenue stream? It takes a shit ton of bandwidth and storage to keep YouTube running, that ain't free.

I get that the ads are incredibly annoying but if you truly watch as much YouTube as some people in this thread are claiming, maybe it's worth paying for it? I bit the bullet and for basically the price of my cancelled Spotify subscription I now have no ads in YT and an okay streaming service with yt music.

Of course Google could do things better. And actually I think it would be important to have a competitor. But I wouldn't expect that one to be free either.