this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
525 points (70.8% liked)

Memes

45891 readers
1395 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The problem is it's fundamentally changing the source of energy in a car. Even if you ripped out the motor and replaced it with an electric motor and battery Bank there would still be a whole fundamental sleuth of systems that would be missing inside the car. I think I better solution might be to look into converting cars to hydrogen instead.

Also feel free to ignore anything I just said I'm not no automotive engineer, just a nerd who used to tinker with cars when he was younger ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hydrogen is not an energy source, it is a means of energy storage, and a pretty bad one at that.

[โ€“] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Also, it's primarily made using methane steam reformation, which releases co2.

[โ€“] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's the real problem. I wish hydrogen helped. Fuel cells and hydrogen are another way to store and release electricity, like batteries. Switching a car from gas to battery is a tricky proposition. Since they require more components to achieve the same result, delivering electricity to an electric motor, fuel cells would compound that problem.

[โ€“] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you want to go that route I think you should look more towards bikes and less towards cars.