this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1087 points (98.9% liked)

> Greentext

7581 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Space is a terrible vacuum. It's full of literally everything.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

So is my vacuum.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In that regard Space can no longer be considered to be a vacuum. Not even remotely.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The distance between stuff is so inconceivably huge that it's still a vacuum. Kind of incredible to think about.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What are you even talking about? I can see loads of stuff right here.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

True vacuum doesn't exist, it's always relative to something else, generally to common human environment.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is absurdly untrue. Space is VERY empty. The above comment is just plain wrong. CERN has the best vacuum in the world at around 1000 atoms/cc. Deep space is less than 1. Even nebulae have a density far below 1000 atoms/cc, and those are the most dense regions of space.

It may be true that we use vacuum pumps for chip manufacturing that get vacuums less dense than the exosphere, which we like to call space sometimes, but it's definitely influenced by Earth and not a good definition of a space vacuum.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's a joke, buddy.

If space was a vacuum then Roger Wilco would be out of work.