this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
149 points (92.6% liked)

News

21742 readers
5954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wasnt pearl harbor an attack on a military base? So a totally valid target for a war. This was an attack on civillians so the comparision is bad.

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not the point of the comparison. The point of similarity is that it was a significant blow that struck without the defenders anticipating it.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was to go to war? Before that the US pubic was super anti-joining WWII (like 80+%), then all of a sudden, for the first and last time in history of logic, in the middle of a world conflict no less, they put all of their navy eggs in one lil basket & announced that very publicly to everyone.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

it was actually done to prevent a war, as weird as it may sound.

  1. It was meant to intimidate the Japanese and prevent them from attacking the US. kind of a "look at us, we put our fleet closer to you, we are ready to fight you, so don't even try to attack us!" move. didn't really work out as planned though.
  2. It was also done to intimidate the Japanese into stopping committing their Atrocities in China.

So no, it was most certainly not done to enter a war.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know what was the formal rhetoric, yet nobody can explain how grouping ships (that Japanese already knew about & their numbers didn't suddenly increase) in a very defenseless way helps intimidate anyone that does not come for a guided tour - which wasn't really needed as they intentionally posted detailed photos in papers & sent the seamen on vacation.

Not to mention that you can't intimidate someone with a bad tactical decision, this isn't a split second decision-making, all of it takes months of planning. And all the documented warnings within the military were just ignored as false positives.

And US didn't really give a damn about China at that time (no political pressure either), but they owned quite a lot of debt and other interests towards various European countries. But the public was still full of veterans from previous wars & Nazi propaganda was hitting strong in US (eg rich manufacturers & exporters like Ford, but also "common folk" responded to their, em, "racial theories").

But above all that, everytime since the civil war when US arms industry didn't get a big hike in spending seemingly extremely ~~provoked~~ preventable attacks happen that saway the public option in a big way for the next two decades (then hippies come, get criminalized, a few years of peace, etc).

So in about 10 years or so US will rig live nukes (in a random city like Las Vegas) & connect them to a big red bottom, pay Hollywood to make action movies about it ... then sad times of money over mass tragedy continue.

On January 27, 1941, Grew secretly cabled the State Department with rumors passed on by the Peruvian Minister to Japan: "Japan military forces planned a surprise mass attack at Pearl Harbor in case of 'trouble' with the United States." -- wiki/Joseph_Grew

Edit: Oh, my bad, US did go beyond politics & actively blockaded resources to Japan.

[–] conquer4@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, it's more like 9/11 for Israel.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Were the people auditing a missing $9 trillion in government spending killed?

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

So a totally valid target for a war

only two small Problems:

  1. they didn't constrain themselves to just military installations
  2. the Fact that there was no fucking war at the time

idk about you, but imo you need to actually be at war to be allowed to attack anything, even if you think it's a "totally valid target for war"