Technology

37525 readers
274 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Hey Beeple and visitors to Beehaw: I think we need to have a discussion about !technology@beehaw.org, community culture, and moderation. First, some of the reasons that I think we need to have this conversation.

  1. Technology got big fast and has stayed Beehaw's most active community.
  2. Technology gets more reports (about double in the last month by a rough hand count) than the next highest community that I moderate (Politics, and this is during election season in a month that involved a disastrous debate, an assassination attempt on a candidate, and a major party's presumptive nominee dropping out of the race)
  3. For a long time, I and other mods have felt that Technology at times isn’t living up to the Beehaw ethos. More often than I like I see comments in this community where users are being abusive or insulting toward one another, often without any provocation other than the perception that the other user’s opinion is wrong.

Because of these reasons, we have decided that we may need to be a little more hands-on with our moderation of Technology. Here’s what that might mean:

  1. Mods will be more actively removing comments that are unkind or abusive, that involve personal attacks, or that just have really bad vibes.
    a. We will always try to be fair, but you may not always agree with our moderation decisions. Please try to respect those decisions anyway. We will generally try to moderate in a way that is a) proportional, and b) gradual.
    b. We are more likely to respond to particularly bad behavior from off-instance users with pre-emptive bans. This is not because off-instance users are worse, or less valuable, but simply that we aren't able to vet users from other instances and don't interact with them with the same frequency, and other instances may have less strict sign-up policies than Beehaw, making it more difficult to play whack-a-mole.
  2. We will need you to report early and often. The drawbacks of getting reports for something that doesn't require our intervention are outweighed by the benefits of us being able to get to a situation before it spirals out of control. By all means, if you’re not sure if something has risen to the level of violating our rule, say so in the report reason, but I'd personally rather get reports early than late, when a thread has spiraled into an all out flamewar.
    a. That said, please don't report people for being wrong, unless they are doing so in a way that is actually dangerous to others. It would be better for you to kindly disagree with them in a nice comment.
    b. Please, feel free to try and de-escalate arguments and remind one another of the humanity of the people behind the usernames. Remember to Be(e) Nice even when disagreeing with one another. Yes, even Windows users.
  3. We will try to be more proactive in stepping in when arguments are happening and trying to remind folks to Be(e) Nice.
    a. This isn't always possible. Mods are all volunteers with jobs and lives, and things often get out of hand before we are aware of the problem due to the size of the community and mod team.
    b. This isn't always helpful, but we try to make these kinds of gentle reminders our first resort when we get to things early enough. It’s also usually useful in gauging whether someone is a good fit for Beehaw. If someone responds with abuse to a gentle nudge about their behavior, it’s generally a good indication that they either aren’t aware of or don’t care about the type of community we are trying to maintain.

I know our philosophy posts can be long and sometimes a little meandering (personally that's why I love them) but do take the time to read them if you haven't. If you can't/won't or just need a reminder, though, I'll try to distill the parts that I think are most salient to this particular post:

  1. Be(e) nice. By nice, we don't mean merely being polite, or in the surface-level "oh bless your heart" kind of way; we mean be kind.
  2. Remember the human. The users that you interact with on Beehaw (and most likely other parts of the internet) are people, and people should be treated kindly and in good-faith whenever possible.
  3. Assume good faith. Whenever possible, and until demonstrated otherwise, assume that users don't have a secret, evil agenda. If you think they might be saying or implying something you think is bad, ask them to clarify (kindly) and give them a chance to explain. Most likely, they've communicated themselves poorly, or you've misunderstood. After all of that, it's possible that you may disagree with them still, but we can disagree about Technology and still give one another the respect due to other humans.
2
3
4
 
 

“These big companies think they can enter small villages like ours, take our land, and destroy it.”

  • Microsoft is building a data center in Mekaguda, a village in the southern Indian state of Telangana, which is expected to start operations by 2025. About 70% of the construction has been completed.
  • Last month, the state government intervened after Microsoft cited problems with the local village council.
  • A group of local residents has filed a petition against Microsoft, claiming encroachment and the dumping of industrial waste in a nearby body of water. The court hearing for the petition is pending.

Addition: Why are E-Waste Strategies in Need for Sustainable Data Centers?

E-waste in data centers encompasses a wide array of discarded IT equipment such as servers, power distribution units, and other electronic components that are no longer in use. Despite the rapid pace of technological upgrades, the alarming statistic from the UN forecasts that e-waste volumes could reach 74.7 metric tons globally by 2030.

5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/2189807

Held together without any solder ^^

Uses an old phone battery for power and is housed in the box that the heltec v3 hardware was shipped in. Unfortunately I had to bend a row of pins to fit it in the box with the battery, but this is only because on my model the two rows of pins are already soldered in. Normally they should be included extra I think.

I am seeing lots of other meshtastic devices, but haven't yet managed to send a message. Maybe I am not in a good location or I need a better antenna.

Kinda want to buy a second device just for messing around with two of these ^^

I highly recommend buying off of aliexpress directly.

6
 
 

- There is growing resentment across Southeast Asia against Chinese e-commerce firms.__

- Import tariffs can create tensions and hurt some local businesses.__

- Southeast Asian nations are also pulling out all the stops to welcome Chinese electric vehicle makers such as BYD and GWM, with subsidies and other incentives to set up manufacturing plants, due to growing trade deficits with China.__

Indonesia is Southeast Asia’s largest e-commerce market, accounting for nearly half the gross merchandise value of the eight top platforms, according to advisory firm Momentum Works. The value of e-commerce sales in Indonesia hit $77 billion last year, authorities say.

Chinese imports had enjoyed low, or zero, duties in Indonesia under regional trade agreements. But as sales of cheap clothes, shoes, and electronics surged online, the government stepped in to protect local businesses. President Joko Widodo has repeatedly raised concerns about low-priced Chinese-made goods, and urged consumers to shun imported products. The country has imposed the strictest curbs on cross-border e-commerce sales in the region. It set a de minimis limit — the threshold below which goods are not subject to import duties — at $100, then lowered that to $75, and then to $3. Authorities also banned shopping on social media platforms last year, forcing TikTok Shop to close. But the platform was back online after about two months, saying it had met the requirements.

Across Southeast Asia, other governments are also cracking down with higher import duties and outright bans on some goods. Malaysia has a 10% sales tax on imported goods priced below 500 ringgit ($106), while the Philippines has imposed a 1% withholding tax on online merchants. In Thailand, the entry of Chinese e-commerce firm Temu has sparked calls for higher tariffs on some imported goods. More taxes and curbs on e-commerce firms may be imminent across the region, Simon Torring, co-founder of research firm Cube Asia, says.

[...]

While Southeast Asian nations are trying to rein in Chinese e-commerce firms, they are also pulling out all the stops to welcome Chinese electric vehicle makers such as BYD and GWM, with subsidies and other incentives to set up manufacturing plants. Indonesia has a trade deficit with China, but authorities were forced to roll back some import restrictions earlier this year after complaints that they led to a slowdown in manufacturing.

7
8
 
 

In many ways, we’re right back to where we were during the last major monopolization case against Microsoft in the late 1990s. From the time Microsoft first lost in 2000 to when it struck a settlement in 2001, legal challenges, tech lobbying, and the turnover of presidential administrations into more tech-friendly hands all watered down the ultimate result, despite a historic defeat. Even greater challenges are facing regulators this time around with Google.


With its many tentacles in power centers in Washington, Google still has plenty of tools at its disposal to try to undermine the case and save its own skin.

The main lesson that Silicon Valley took away from the Microsoft case was that Bill Gates didn’t treat the threat of government action seriously, and thus had an ill-equipped ragtag lobbying operation. Google decided it would not make the same mistake and built up one of the most robust influence-peddling operations in the District, as documented in the recent book The Wolves of K Street. High-powered lobbyists like Tony Podesta and others came up with a new playbook to brush back regulatory oversight by paying outside researchers to launder industry talking points through the guise of neutral “expertise.” In particular, Google’s team deployed this to help tamp down an FTC investigation during the Obama administration. From Google’s early days, Eric Schmidt and Adam Kovacevich, a former Google executive now at a Google-funded organization called the Chamber of Progress, were tasked to develop this machine in Washington in the hopes of preemptively averting a case like the one they’re facing now.

9
 
 

Any ideas?

10
11
 
 

Archived link

The 2024 Paris Olympic Games have also turned into a game field for rumors. Though there are some similarities, the rumors circulating in Chinese and English are somewhat different.

[...]

As pro-Kremlin and far-right sources promoted disinformation about potential terrorist attacks on the Paris Olympics and soaring street crime in Paris, Chinese social media echoed the Russian narratives with false stories of frightening crimes and attacks on Olympic athletes in Paris. For example, multiple clips on the Chinese short-video platforms Kuaishou and Douyin conveyed the same story: a boxing coach from an Olympic team was robbed and beaten to death. In a separate incident, the US team's portable air conditioners were stolen, causing an American athlete to suffer from heat stroke and eventually die in the Olympic Village.

As a matter of fact, no American athlete died from heat stroke, nor did a boxing coach have a violent encounter and lose his life to the robbery incident. During the Paris Olympics, a boxing coach from Samoa passed away, but the cause of death was due to natural causes.

[...]

According to the unfounded stories, French President Emmanuel Macron asked China to assist France with Chinese anti-terrorism technology and maintain security during the Olympic games. For the benefit of the entire world, the Chinese government dispatched 1160 anti-terrorism professionals and equipped the Olympic Games with satellite surveillance systems and facial recognition technology based on China's big data system. Due to the superior Chinese anti-terrorism team and technology, 120 terrorists were arrested in Paris. The French police were extremely impressed by China's advanced surveillance and facial recognition technologies. Even Thomas Bach, President of the International Olympic Committee, acknowledged China's assistance in keeping the Paris Olympic Games safe.

In reality, the Chinese police did not participate in the multi-national police team at the Paris Olympic Games. According to the Taiwan FactCheck Center's investigation, almost 1,800 foreign police officers from 40 countries were in France to help maintain security. However, China was not one of the 40 countries. As for the arrest of terrorists, the French authorities did arrest one Russian man for plotting an assault on the Olympic Games. However, there was no mention of more than 120 terrorists being arrested in France thanks to China's facial recognition technology.

[...]

The Chinese state media has also broken its silence in recent months, publishing articles questioning whether US swimmers used drugs during the Olympics. For example, CCTV produced an article asking "six shocking questions" about "US doping scandals." One of the questions concerned American swimmers' purple faces. The story stated that American media outlets purposefully changed the color of photos and made American swimmers' faces appear white (the original text is "美媒特意调了色,把自己运动员的紫脸P白了"). The piece then contrasted an "adjusted picture" from AP with one from Reuters.

[...]

In addition to Chinese-language coverage, the English edition of Global Times, China's state media famed for its tabloid-style reporting, published an article about the widespread suspicion caused by American swimmers' purple faces. Later, the Global Times published another item stating that the US Embassy in China had posted a color-adjusted photo on Weibo to congratulate US swimmers.

Until August 17, when this analysis was written, the US Embassy's Weibo account had posted a statement that the Embassy did not post photoshopped images. (The Taiwan FactCheck Center is still investigating the claim that the US media intentionally made American swimmers’ faces “look white.” [...]) However, social media posts written in English questioning whether the purple faces could be the result of doping appeared on websites such as Reddit, Quora, and TikTok. Some YouTube influencers interviewed experts to explain the causes of purple faces, but others disputed the explanation and argued certain drugs could cause purple faces. The statement from English-speaking YouTubers claiming the purple faces were caused by drugs was again translated into Chinese and quoted by Chinese netizens.

[...]

12
 
 

Archived version

  • Earlier in 2024, Sygnia observed ‘Velvet Ant’ leveraging a zero-day exploit (CVE-2024-20399) to compromise and control on-premises Cisco Switch appliances. These types of vulnerabilities are used by threat actor to operate on compromised devices in a way that is completely hidden to the enterprise security stack.
  • As part of the ‘Velvet Ant’ multi-year intrusion, the transition to operating from internal network devices marks yet another escalation in the evasion techniques used in order to ensure the continuation of the espionage campaign.
  • The zero-day exploit allows an attacker with valid administrator credentials to the Switch management console to escape the NX-OS command line interface (CLI) and execute arbitrary commands on the Linux underlying operating system. Following the exploitation, ‘Velvet Ant’ deploy tailored malware, which runs on the underlying OS and is invisible to common security tools.
  • The modus-operandi of ‘Velvet Ant’ highlights risks and questions regarding third-party appliances and applications that organizations onboard. Due to the ’black box‘ nature of many appliances, each piece of hardware or software has the potential to turn into the attack surface that an adversary is able to exploit.
  • By enhancing logging, implementing continuous monitoring, and conducting systematic threat hunts on key organizational choke points, organizations can better detect and counteract advanced persistent threats such as ‘Velvet Ant’.
13
14
 
 

On Tuesday the co-founders announced that they have successfully raised $40 million in Series A funding and shared plans for their next two missions. AstroForge has now raised a total of $55 million to date.

...

However, Gialich said AstroForge learned a lot from this mission and is working toward launching a second spacecraft named Odin. This will be a rideshare payload on the Intuitive Machines-2 mission, which is due to launch during the fourth quarter of this year. If successful, the Odin mission would be spectacular. About seven months after launching, Odin will attempt to fly by a near-Earth, metallic-rich asteroid while capturing images and taking data—truly visiting terra incognita. Odin would also be the first private mission to fly by a body in the Solar System beyond the Moon.

...

On Tuesday, the company also announced plans for its third mission, Vestri (the company is naming its missions after Norse deities). This spacecraft will be about twice as large as Odin and is intended to return to the targeted metallic asteroid and dock with it. The docking mechanism is simple—since the asteroid is likely to be iron-rich, Vestri will use magnets to attach itself.

15
 
 

This is a battery manufacturer with shoddy QC and that overstates Amp-hour ratings.

As someone who relies on batteries to survive, this is personally offensive. My entire solar setup is largely thanks to Will Prowse, so when he says to avoid something, I tend to listen. Thankfully, I already have 600Ah of battery that appears to be functioning within normal parameters.

I'm glad to see Rossmann calling this bullshit out.

16
 
 

This is hilarious!

17
18
 
 

Dana Mattioli speaks about her new book, The Everything War, which examines how Amazon came to dominate the U.S. economy through its “scorched-earth” tactics.

“I found just a ton of business practices driven by this toxic culture at Amazon, where the company lied, spied, cheated its way to the top,” she says. Mattioli also discusses the threat of antitrust lawsuits to Amazon and other Big Tech firms, political pressure on U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and more.

[...] Amazon has had a really bumpy history with both the [U.S.} Republicans, specifically Donald Trump, and also the [U.S.] Democrats. You know, [U.S. President Joe] Biden has been really tough on Amazon. He put in place Lina Khan, the head of the Federal Trade Commission, the agency overseeing them. And she brought forward this historic monopoly lawsuit against the company last year.

[...]

Two major Democratic donors, media mogul Barry Diller and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, have publicly called for Kamala Harris to fire FTC Chair Lina Khan, who has led Biden’s antitrust efforts — that’s if Kamela Harris becomes president. Hoffman sits on the board of Microsoft, which was sued by the FTC.

[...]

Lina Khan has become this lightning rod in CEO circles, but specifically in tech circles. We’ve seen CEOs and VCs become very frustrated with the FTC under Lina Khan, because she’s been very critical of them. She’s taken a very close look at their companies. They’ve brought lawsuits against all Big Four tech companies, between the DOJ and the FTC, as well as other companies. So it’s not surprising. But Biden has been a staunch advocate of hers.

[...]

19
 
 

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supporting a group of journalists in their lawsuit against Israeli spyware company NSO Group. In our amicus brief backing the plaintiffs’ appeal, we argued that victims of human rights abuses enabled by powerful surveillance technologies must be able to seek redress through U.S. courts against both foreign and domestic corporations.

NSO Group notoriously manufactures “Pegasus” spyware, which enables full remote control of a target’s smartphone. Pegasus attacks are stealthy and sophisticated: the spyware embeds itself into phones without an owner having to click anything (such as an email or text message). A Pegasus-infected phone allows government operatives to intercept personal data on a device as well as cloud-based data connected to the device.

[...]

The U.S. government has endorsed the Guiding Principles as applied to U.S. companies selling surveillance technologies to foreign governments, but also sought to address the issue of spyware facilitating state-sponsored human rights violations. In 2021, for example, the Biden Administration recognized NSO Group as engaging in such practices by placing it on a list of entities prohibited from receiving U.S. exports of hardware or software.

20
21
 
 
22
 
 

AM4 is still alive somehow XD!

23
 
 

Citing the EFF blog:

In 2022, [Electronic Frontier Foundation] EFF fought along with other privacy groups, domestic violence organizations, and LGBTQ+ rights organizations in the U.S. to prevent the use of GPS-enabled technology in digital license plates. A.B. 984, authored by State Assembly member Lori Wilson and sponsored by digital license plate company Reviver, originally would have allowed for GPS trackers to be placed in the digital license plates of personal vehicles.

As we have said many times, location data is very sensitive information, because where we go can also reveal things we'd rather keep private even from others in our household. Ultimately, advocates struck a deal with the author to prohibit location tracking in passenger cars, and this troubling flaw was removed. Governor Newsom signed A.B. 984 into law.

Now, not even two years later, the state's digital license plate vendor, Reviver, and Assemblymember Wilson have filed A.B. 3138, which directly undoes the deal from 2022 and explicitly calls for location tracking in digital license plates for passenger cars.

24
25
view more: next ›