wooki

joined 1 year ago
[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago

I hope you keep posting! Keep up the good work.

I think likes are your best gauge for your best content. Dislikes could be easily used as an indicator to gauge audiences you dont target in the same manner. Value in all data.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago

No.

It is like and dislike.

Stop trying to justify it as anything else.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 72 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

This is the very definition of gas lighting.

Customers: “This is not what I paid for”

Colossal Order: “You’re so toxic”

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 5 months ago (7 children)

If they dont drop the price by at least 50% goodbye nVidia.

So no more nVidia. Hello Intel.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago

The fact you think people need an LLM to create garbage is just weird. They can do it without it just fine. Better get some tinfoil, I hear putting it on your head stops the Artifical word predictor from copying your thoughts.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 6 months ago

Not new and certainly very much not new to politics. Are you new?

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Again not new stop grandstanding it as a new effect. Media outlets have been doing this since the dawn of journalism. Scientific process created to combat it, political standards to help reduce it fand laws to make it financially unattractive act remains its not new.

The only thing that is new. The financial gain from the hype of abusing the word AI and thr media not calling it out. But hey here we are back at the start. Its not new.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Propaganda isn’t new. Sure it’s more widely available now but it’s not new

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)

I wouldnt be too worried they’ve just made an over glorified word predictor and blender of peoples art

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The realestate claim is just plain backwards. It does depend on the person, but making the claim that people in general are happy to donate part of their home to their employer and impact their families with work from home is just wrong. Emails instead of meetings should be common sense for status meetings and has no impact on the choice to work from home. Meetings that have agendas should be in person, especially if its on sensitive topics. All reasons I have listed above.

Some people sure do benefit working from home. I liked no commute, it saved a lot of money and wasted time but it made home worse.

We work to live. Work should have no place in our home.

view more: next ›