wandermind

joined 1 year ago
[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

I first thought this was a bad idea by Paypal but you opened my eyes

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I thought you were talking about "makaronivelli" before you specified the milk was for drinking.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

So at best we don't know whether or not AI CSAM without CSAM training data is possible. "This AI used CSAM training data" is not an answer to that question. It is even less of an answer to the question "Should AI generated CSAM be illegal?" Just like "elephants get killed for their ivory" is not an answer to "should pianos be illegal?"

If your argument is that yes, all AI CSAM should be illegal whether or not the training used real CSAM, then argue that point. Whether or not any specific AI used CSAM to train is an irrelevant non sequitur. A lot of what you're doing now is replying to "pencils should not be illegal just because some people write bad stuff" with the equivalent of "this one guy did some bad stuff before writing it down". That is completely unrelated to the argument being made.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So why are you posting all over this thread about how CSAM was included in the training set if that is in your opinion ultimately irrelevant with regards to the topic of the post and discussion, the morality of using AI to generate CSAM?

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I know. So to confirm, you're saying that you're okay with AI generated CSAM as long as the training data for the model didn't include any CSAM?

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Chat is this real

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Sounds to me it would be more like outlawing grand pianos because of all of the dead elephants - while some people are claiming that it is possible to make a grand piano without killing elephants.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 months ago

"Check out this painting" "Or as it is also known: a piece of cloth with colors on it"

"Check out this sculpture" "Or as it is also known: a chunk of marble"

Looks cool though

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh not at all, they're patented Skinner burgers, an old family recipe.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 18 points 4 months ago

Furthermore, it's not that the original scientists failed to produce true-color images. The original published images of Neptune had deliberately enhanced colors to better show some of the features of the cloud surface, and the description text of the images said as much. But that nuance was quickly forgotten and everybody just took the deep blue coloring to reflect the actual color of the planet, which spread to depictions of the planet everywhere.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's literally not how it works, anything else is Russian fearmongering.

Also a bunch of countries fucking up a single country who can't even conquer their neighbor does not a world war make. If it did, the Gulf War would be called WW3 already.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean.

One might be a coincidence.

Two out of two? Considering how few high profile whistleblowers there are, that is much more unlikely to be due to random chance, statistically speaking.

Similar to how it's not impossible that someone might fall out of a window and die.

But if in a certain country, important people who have crossed the leadership keep falling out of windows, ... well.

view more: next ›