[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 1 points 5 months ago

@const_void It's not about choosing distros in anyway, please read the post before you comment. ๐Ÿ™„

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 2 points 5 months ago

@CrabAndBroom Thank you, but I already covered this ๐Ÿ˜… When you check my profile, you will see thats exactly the stuff I'm dealing with day by day, but ty! I may will take a look at OpenSnitch, but I think Portmaster is already covering this need.

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 2 points 5 months ago

@keydelk @linux Hm, ig I will stick to Cinnamon, I don't want to run into issues, using another environment which got discontinued by Linux Mint a few years before for some reasons.

Abt the browser and content blocking, is already done ;) Privacy and Security is one of the things I'm very good at, just wanted to know how to enchance the security of Linux Mint.

Btw. I would recommend uBlock Origin instead of ADP is leightweighter, customizable, opensource, non-commercial and pretty well. Since ADP had some controversies in the past.

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 1 points 5 months ago

@MuffinJets @linux Oh sorry, forgot to mention it, I'm using Cinnamon since I liked it the most

70
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Hey ๐Ÿ‘‹ dear Linux Community,

I'm still kinda new to Linux (started using this year ๐Ÿ˜…) I already made it to my main OS, even if I still missing some things which I used on Windows, anyway. What I wanted to ask you guys, what recommendations do you have for Linux Mint (Cinnamon)? In terms of security, optimization, (a way to make the UI looking modern ;-;) and privacy? I would be very interested in what you do guys to optimize your Linux setup :) I'm pretty technical, so there is nothing which could overwhelm me (probaly).

Thx! ๐Ÿค

#privacy #dataprotection #linux #linuxmint #opensource #foss #cybersecurity @linux

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 1 points 7 months ago

@Bear_with_a_hammer Ah alright, goos to know. Do you have a link to it?

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 2 points 7 months ago

@programmer_belch Not sure since I'm not so good at javascript, but I know abt several reports and articles that Edge users has the same issue as Firefox users.

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 5 points 7 months ago

@SaltyIceteaMaker Same, I think it's bc of uBO or other modifications from or which I made to LibreWolf, but other people made reports on Reddit and other Social Media platforms that they expierenced that and the code obviously shows that YT is doing that stuff.

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 8 points 7 months ago

@Asudox Firefox and Edge are two of the biggest competitors to Chrome, Edge is like a degoogled version of Chromium but with a bunch of Microsoft Trash instead, they don't even have Google Safebrowsing or Google as default search engine like Firefox does.

217
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

#YouTube is making the watching experience worse on #Firefox and Microsoft Edge.

I didn't believe it the first time I heard abt it, since it sounded more like a conspiracy theory than a actual thing, but it's true. Google does add 5s timeout specifically to Firefox and Edge users when they try to watch a video on YT. If you want to know more about it, Mental Outlaw make a very good video abt it (Link: https://youtu.be/v4gXhmzQztE ). I think Google did this, to get people moving to Chrome since the majority will think this is a browser issue, nobody would expect YouTube to purposely doing this. In the attached Screenshot you can see that YouTube checks the user agent of browsers to see if it's Edge, Firefox or not. You can bypass this by changing your User agent to chrome.

Edit: Due a lot of people saying a lot of different things abt it, I want to say that I'm not 100% sure abt how exactly this works, there is a inbuild delay by Google, but who is actually affected, there are a lot of different opinions abt it. I wasn't able to verify this myself in LibreWolf, but this could be the case due my intensive hardening I did and this is just a result of what I found in the code and what Mental Outlaw and others shared across social media, if you got different or additional infos abt this feel free to comment and I suggest everyone ti also check the comment section.

#privacy #youtube #google #dataprotection #firefox #msedge #browser @privacy

90
Did you know..? (infosec.exchange)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one

Did you know..?

DuckDuckGo has two non-javascript versions of their search engine and both of them are very lightweight, especially the lite version.

You can access them via:

Html: https://html.duckduckgo.com/html

Lite: https://lite.duckduckgo.com/lite

#privacy #duckduckgo #dgg #searchengine @privacyguides

-41
submitted 8 months ago by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Good news! Brave for Android now let's u use your favorite uBlock Origin Blocklists!

Under Settings > Brave Shields & privacy

Can you now add custom filterlists and edit Brave's default selection of the already avaible filterlists. Some of you now that this was possible before too (via brave://adblock) but at this time it had no UI and wasn't a official feature, now you can easily add, remove and customize fiterlists via the the settings.

#brave #bravebrowser #browser #privacy @privacy

162
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Warning to all Brave Browser Users

Blocking variations.brave.com which is used for A/B testing could potentially break Brave's functionalities. For me did Brave's "forgetful browsing" feature broke which seems to be disabled by default if you block this domain.

#brave #bravebrowser #privacy @privacy @privacyguides

187
submitted 9 months ago by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Say (an encrypted) hello to a more private internet.

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/encrypted-hello/

Nothing big, but kinda interesting. I'm excited to see how this will go ๐Ÿ‘€

#privacy #mozilla #firefox @privacy

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 8 points 9 months ago

@free Yep, thats why people invest a lot of time which have much more technical understanding than you have to create products to improve the privacy problem on Windows, Privacy isn't a privilege which only a specific group of human is allowed to have, Privacy is a human right and should be accessable for everyone. If you miss the understanding for that, I would recommend informing yourself better then spreading false information.

279
submitted 9 months ago by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 3 points 9 months ago

@LiveLM I agree, I think more privacy extensions should be avaible for both, Chromium and Firefox.

[-] voxel@infosec.exchange 5 points 9 months ago

@mrclark @privacyguides @privacy The extension literally can monitor itself ๐Ÿ’€ and you can use something like Portmaster.

55
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one

Little Rat - a browser extension for monitoring other extensions

"Little Rat is an open-source extension designed for network traffic monitoring. Easily view, monitor, and block traffic from other Chrome extensions on a per-extension basis."

I use it myself and I think it's a very useful extension for everyone who uses more than just few extensions for different purposes and don't fully trust them that they send no data as the developer promises, this extension can monitor the network and act as a firewall per-extension basis.

Download (Lite Version | Can't monitor requests, only block): https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/little-rat/oiopkpalpilladnibecobcecijffaflf

Source Code and full version (recommended):
https://github.com/dnakov/little-rat/

(I'm not affliate with the developer in any way and just wanted to share this)

#privacy #browser #chromium #browserextensions @privacyguides @privacy

0
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

So, I'm interested how the implementation of "Perfect Forward Secrecy" in Signal looks like, like does every messages has a different encryption key? or does it change over time like #whatsapp does? I tried to find any official documention of this, sadly did not find anything.

Thats why I'm asking, does anyone of you know smth about this and maybe can provide a link to a official source?

#signal #signalapp #privacy #encryption @signalapp @SignalUpdateInfo @privacy

view more: next โ€บ

voxel

joined 10 months ago