threeganzi

joined 1 year ago
[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why should someone be able to live off dividends if they have “ultra-rich” wealth at the bank? This person has a lot of money so if they live in an RV it’s obviously a choice they made.

Plus they could just spend some of that stock money and go below “ultra rich” level and get taxed less. And perhaps then they have to use part of their non-ultra-rich wealth to live their RV dream life to supplement their dividends. Doesn’t sound too bad.

TLDR; I don’t feel bad for someone that can’t live dividends when hey have more than one million euro in the bank.

Edit: while is still stand by comment, I do see I missed your point about fairness. Not too big of a problem in my mind. Or perhaps a solution would be to tax home values above X amount? (Edit2: and only the amount above X)

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thanks for the context. And I have no idea who Paul Magnette is so I’ll take your word for it.

I think your point about cost of family homes makes sense. If that is the case it might need an adjustment.

I have no experience with economic systems, but I wonder what the effect on home prices would be if taxed at the levels proposed. My hunch would be that home prices would decrease. The risk is of course that families with less financial means that borrowed money to afford a home will loose money.

Regardless, the main problem is extreme wealth disparity. My question is mainly, are the home prices high because wealth is high?

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What makes you say it’s a just another tax on the middle class?

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

If we could just have a tax based on carbon footprint it would incentivize better decisions. And perhaps start low and then slowly increase the tax at a constant and predictable rate so industry and consumers can plan ahead. The tax income could also be equally distributed to all citizens, where people with less carbon footprint gets money back. And now we’ll have a thriving economy driving the climate transition.

Check out Citizens Climate Lobby by the way.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

It’s great that she sets the record straight but I didn’t see anything in the article about her saying she was treated well. And I wouldn’t say being held hostage is ever being treated well. I would like to know how she was treated though, as it can’t be easy to “take care” of a hostage in the very dire situation right now in all of Gaza, even if you wanted to.

None of that is to say Israel is in the right, my opinion is quite the opposite.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

I was just gonna say, has to Flux

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)

Not that I will convince you to use signal, but there are desktop versions as well, so technically not required to use a smart phone.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What about that is Zoroastrian?

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

Ah, that makes sense

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

~~Yeah, pretty much as Flex at 97% which is a nice comparison.~~

Edit: See mattd’s comment

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, perhaps not as standard as I thought!

view more: next ›