suntzu

joined 1 year ago
[–] suntzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

One big shared media volume has multiple benefits, each server just have to deal with their own user management, no server switching or remembering if that one movie is of this or that Server....

[–] suntzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Then I have multiple jellyfin servers in the app.... That's not what I want, I want a single mount where all the media of all nodes is accessible

[–] suntzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

On each node, map all the other nodes as smb, and configure all in jellyfin.

It would be nicer to have one single mount.

[–] suntzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

I use synching too, but it's not what I'm looking for here.

 

I run a full media server, as well do a few friends. Now we had the idea to share our media libraries. In a first quick attempt we, mounted each other's library folder via an smb share and imported those in jellyfin (all servers connected by VPN) Works quite well, but is kind of cumbersome the more people get in. I had the following idea: distributed storage, not as in redundancy, but more like mergerfs. Each "node" allocates a certain amount of storage, say node A, B and C provide 1TB each, these get fused into a singe mount that shows up as 3TB volume. If one node goes offline, the volume will only be 2TB and all files on the offline node will of course be unavailable.

Did a bit of research and found stuff like ceph,.glusterfs or seeweedfs, all of which I guess have a lot more functionality and thus are quite complicated and a little over my head. Do you do something like that or have any good ideas how to do that easily?