simplecyphers

joined 1 year ago
[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I tried to watch it and kinda gave up. I tried to accept that it would be at most a reference to the book, but i still, just, couldnt.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They probably aren’t. But they are qualified to comment on a theoretical post about the subject.

OP is asking what each person would contribute, not that each person must contribute something that they are qualified to. Which, for the most of us, is nothing. So get off your “intellectual” high horse and contribute to the conversation or change your non-contributions to silence instead of pedantic bullcrap.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are are obviously 6041776 centimeters in one good American inch. The “cent” comes from “sent” from how we sent the brits packing, twice.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t that poisonous in large quantities?

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Rabbit prison deer.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I am ungovernable

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Encounter building/balancing doesn’t stop at initiative.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Technically you are “right” but you are also being obtuse (pun intended).

If you could bare to stretch your mind, and realize “not to scale” means “trust the numbers, not the graphic” you could in turn, realize that it is, in fact, 3 sided.

Every side of every shape is made up of infinite 180 degree angles and 2 angles that are different. Every. Single. One.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mathematicians dont want to to know this one strange trick, hide a secret corner of 180 degrees in any triangle to instantly make it a quadrilateral, without even changing the shape!!

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They just overlap much more recently

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the definition. I think it is wrong. But i appreciate it nonetheless.

My reasoning is that, while it may have started as a theistic word, it isn’t anymore. When someone says it i don’t think “a creation of God” i just think of like, an animal. Definitions change over time.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I understand that completely, death isn’t where the suffering usually occurs. This brings me to another question that i proposed in response to a different comment.

I had family that raised a cow to eventually become meat. It was named Tasty and lived up to its namesake. Tasty was treated well and killed quickly and cleanly. Is that, like, bad?

view more: next ›