sean

joined 1 month ago
[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago

I got the joke;p

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty spot on observation! I've been on the fediverse since 2015 (mastodon) and leftists and libertarians were definitely the original fediverse folk. I was more right leaning back then, wasn't as averse to calling ancaps anarchists but now I am definitely not holding that view anymore. 2020 changed shit. Ancaps aren't here to help anarchists.

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, we typically consider liberalism (you all may know it as classical liberalism as well, it, too, counts as liberalism) equivalent to capitalism

We (I'm speaking for anarchists and socialists) are leftists. This is what we stand against: Capitalism and the ownership of the means of production being held by the owner/capitalist class. We wish property to be held by the working class—the laborers. We are socialists. This means property goes bye bye—Property is Theft!! (thank you Pierre Jospeh Proudhon :)This is the socialist ideal, it is incompatible with liberalism and its capitalist necessities. It's this thinking that makes liberals and tankies hate anarchist socialists—we go against the order they seek. They, too, realize it's incompatibilities.

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you wish to end capitalism? If your answer is no, you are, in fact, a liberal—completely agree

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (25 children)

I'm an anarchist socialist. We hate tankies, we hate libs. Libs are capitalists. Tankies are authoritarian. We hate both of those. Eh not hate but you know what I mean. Not ideologically compatible, therefore not allowed in the commune and you aren't allowed to hurt others, and if I hear a lib say how they're going to employ someone or a tankie talk about a vanguard state I'm gonna be upset

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This sounds like a legal playbook for would-be assassins. Kill at the cost of 15 years with parole max

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If what Luigi did was terrorism then I support terrorism! Viva La terror!!!

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd probably be ready to split your head open if you were #1 so that's a good thing you aren't a degenerate religious zealot nobility fuck

You also don't want to move meat fodder for some politicians war, imagine how North Korean soldiers are being used in Ukraine right now—being tossed at drones so the Russian elite forces flank... you want to be that meat fodder for some weird strange reason and you think you'll be seen as a hero, no youlll get spit on. You don't want to be any of them, you think the "elite" forces are better off? Fuck invading someone else's home. You don't want to be invaded either, be happy with peace

Don't settle for being a corporate slave either, you limit your possibilities only to what has happened in the past or in media, not imagining what you actually want

You are born just In time to see a wave of worker co-ops flood the lower classes, you are born just in time to see the community around you needs you right now, not tomorrow

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The mere fact that ChatGPT “knows” about certain things indicate that it ingested certain copyrighted works.

This is the bit I'm responding to. This "mere fact" that you propose is not copyright infringement by facts I've stated. I'm not making claims to any of your other original statements

Verbatim reproduction may be copyright infringement, but that wasn't your original claim that I quoted and am responding to (I didn't make that clear earlier, that's on me).

"Apologies" for my autistic way of communicating (I'm autistic)

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 days ago

Strangely, ai would have gotten that part right.

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 days ago

I've seen many photoshops in my day

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Facts aren't protected by copyright. Regurgitating facts about a thing is in no way illegal, even if done by ai and done by ingested copyrighted material. I can legally make a website dedicated to stating only facts about Disney products (all other things the same) when prompted by questions of my users.

view more: next ›