rc_buggy

joined 4 months ago
[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Costs rising more than 3% a year. Since it's California I'd imagine the insurance is going up much faster than 3% of total ownership costs. If small landlords cannot stay in the black because they can't afford the insurance with capped rent increases they will sell to the entities that can afford to self-insure. Corporations like BlackRock

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Oh man, that makes me feel better.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is that ~10mm rod on the green one the trailing arm?! They look fragile and like they would get stuck really easily. Might be a spooled 2wd but I sort of doubt it.

If the paths are made for them, they would probably work fine but on a western ranch? nope.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I don't use it because Calyx is "good enough" and I make a lot of my decisions about which projects to use based on the community associated with them. Graphene has a toxic as fuck community, Calyx is very carebear.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I use TrueNAS and just checked: There is an available Minecraft app and also something called MineOS (seems to be a front end to make managing the server easier). My plex running through the same app ecosystem stays updated and hasn't failed me yet. I used to run the service separate from the NAS, but this is real nice.

FreeNAS and UnRaid probably have the same functionality.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought we weren't supposed to kink shame. Maybe /u/Raglesnarf is really into degradation and being dominated. Full on ball-busting, perhaps?

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No vassals, you are landed gentry. You own your machine now.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Despite being named NYU, it is in fact a private university so yeah, no 1A protection there.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

nobody has talked about it for years

March 2024: https://www.9news.com/article/news/investigations/police-use-colorado-dmv-facial-recognition-program/73-0c2d862c-a33c-4598-bc0a-e0d1a8ee287f

There are rumblings here in CO about curtailing law enforcement's use of this database. I personally would like to have subpoena protection of the database, so at least it has to go before a judge before the cops just rifle through everyone's pictures.

This is especially concerning given that citizens are recently being required to update their ID to a “Real ID,” which means more people than ever before are giving away the rights to their own face.

lol, no. Real ID is just a set of requirements the federal govt. has implemented to make sure state IDs are held to the same standard as passports re: data integrity and information presented. That's all. Not mark of the beast, not something nefarious to track you more than your old state-issued DL did in the past. As far as "recently"? Nope, states have had 20 years.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

lol, PItbull "won" the air travel top spot last year and you don't hear shit from him about being tracked.

[–] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's fun to watch airplanes. Watching them via radio is also fun. The data has been public since the FAA started issuing tail numbers and it's never really been an issue before.

What's really fucked up is that these jets currently operate under Part 91, just like grandpa's Cessna. Quite unregulated when it comes to how long the pilots can fly and the taxes are lower than Part 135 which is where I believe these private jets should operate. IMO a private plane should be owner operated, allowing the individual to determine safety limits. Part 135 regulates quite a bit more, including pilot rest periods and allowed weather conditions. We already regulate these billionaire's car drivers more stringently than a regular driver, why not the air travel too?

edit: oh, duh. If the airplane operates under Part 135 it can easily be owned by an LLC which is the same form of privacy protection I (and many others) use to shield my identity in real estate records.

view more: next ›