porkchop

joined 1 year ago
[–] porkchop@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If you’re a professional shooting 4K 60 ProRes video you likely have the budget to upgrade the storage (or shoot with a real professional grade camera.) it’s highly unlikely you could have a good user experience with 128GB (minus the OS and all your other personal garbage) filling up in minutes shooting in this mode. The lower capacity models aren’t designed for those specific use cases in mind, and it’s cool they’ve found a way around that limitation through the use of external attached storage.

[–] porkchop@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

They use the chrome rendering engine but they are not chrome. You get the best of both worlds. Compatibility with your corporate g suite whatever with a security/privacy-first mindset (at least with Brave)

[–] porkchop@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s in the article. 450g

[–] porkchop@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They work great for me in chromium based browsers like Arc or Brave

[–] porkchop@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave and Arc for me! F chrome ;)

view more: ‹ prev next ›