it shows that the evidence you've provided doesn't actually support your claim
nsrxn
joined 1 week ago
it's not useless if it describes something.
it doesn't need to be misconstrued. the best propaganda imho is totally true and in context. spreading it with some kind of political goal is still propaganda.
the only peer reviewed source you provided spends as much time detailing risks as it does explaining potential benefits, and it's based on a single case study.
oooh. I like rope! and knives. basically, I own a boyscout handbook from the 90s
I like open protocols and free software, and during the API exodus there was finally enough content that I wanted to jump ship.
of course I had annoyances with reddit, but I have annoyances with Lemmy too.
it's still preferable imho
do you have the CO2 data for that period as well
I haven't seen them, but I do know they work with the pentagon, so my guess is they aim to legitimize American hegemony and military spending