nsrxn

Which part is speculative

the origin and intent of the comments you don't like.

you are making a positive claim (propagandists are prevalent on Lemmy), but you have no proof. while, of course, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, what you are doing achieves the exact thing younclaim the propagandists want: creating division in our communities.

this is speculative

edit: and non-falsifiable

double edit: interestingly, your entire line of discussion helps achieve the exact division you are proposing is the goal of the propagandists you insist are operating here.

can you substantiate this?

you are not interested in engaging in good faith

your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.

from your first comment here, you are distracting from the intent of the original post to grandstand

creatures that you abuse

there is no reason to believe they are abusing anything

The experiences of animals are real and matter.

whether something matters is subject to individuals values. something that matters to me might not matter to you.

Plants DON’T HAVE EXPERIENCES.

you can't prove this

You cannot be cruel to a plant. You cannot commit violence against a plant. You cannot commit atrocity against a plant. These are things you do every time you buy an egg.

every sentence here is false.

it's one reason among many.

I'm not willing to risk that it might be true

trustworthiness is always a matter of opinion.