niartenyaw

joined 1 year ago
[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago

don't worry, there's a lot of men that get fucked too

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

companies are capable of operating under different rules in different jurisdictions, they do it all the time. just look at how they handle data in EU due to GDPR vs how they do it everywhere else. I don't see why this case would be much different.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

ok but I'm not in the EU nor is my instance so that doesn't really apply to me.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

yeah, I see them being posted into their DB (and therefore federated as) a post as if they are a user. they can earmark that post as an ad and properly present it as such in their own platform but anyone federated would see the post as-is.

they could either obfuscate how they mark it as an ad or just not provide that information at all to federating instances.

then I can totally see them claiming they don't control other instances and can't be responsible for whether or not the federated ads are presented as such.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

they technically could do this by representing ads with posts.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago

ribbed for his pleasure

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 11 points 2 months ago

but if they don't walk the knife's edge of allowing fascism, how are the ultra-wealthy Democrats supposed to make line go up?

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

my preference is Xitter (pronounced shitter)

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and that's unfortunately only true because the greedy groups have destroyed all the non-greedy ones by slaughter or forced participation

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

we just need to make sure that we don't rely on their instance(s) too heavily so we only have minimal losses when they eventually do drop support.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it may be more comprehensive than trying to scrape other platforms, but the data that is available is absolutely nothing compared to what they collect on their own platforms. they're almost certainly not very concerned with collecting our relatively mild amount of data.

 

TL;DR

using/generating energy always emits heat as waste and there is an upper limit of efficiency that we are not that far from. if that energy was generated via something that is not a natural heat gradient for the earth's surface there is a net increase of heat in the earth system simply by generating and using energy.

a lot of energy sources fall into this: fossil fuel, nuclear, geothermal, etc. two that don't are (certain types of) solar and wind, since their energy would eventually be dissipated onto earth's surface whether we intercept or not.

that waste heat is currently estimated to be ~2% of the heating power caused by global warming, so already significant. we essentially have an upper limit on sustainable energy usage on earth (and therefore an avg per person usage) or we will have Global Warming 2: Waste Heat Boogaloo.

view more: next ›