mindlesscrollyparrot

joined 9 months ago
[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Losing 2,000 litres of helium is possibly the worst part of this.

That is the error that the model made. Your quote talks about the causes of these errors. I asked what caused the model to make this error.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but which of these factors do you think were relevant to the case in the article? The AI seems to have had a large corpus of documents relating to the reporter. Those articles presumably stated clearly that he was the reporter and not the defendant. We are left with "incorrect assumptions made by the model". What kind of assumption would that be?

In fact, all of the results are hallucinations. It's just that some of them happen to be good answers and others are not. Instead of labelling the bad answers as hallucinations, we should be labelling the good ones as confirmation bias.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the children don't have a choice, so I assume you're talking about the choice to target the militants there and not in another place.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, specifically militants who are fathers.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Hamas uses phones, hence the "Where's Daddy?" attack, which is not directed at tunnels. It's more-or-less designed to hit civilians. The clue is in the name.

That isn't the explanation the article gives. Punch 1 of the 1-2 punch is that heavier rain - also caused by climate change - allows grass to grow higher, and that is why there is more fuel.

I guess it's quite easy to test though: we had extensive wildfires last year; those areas should be safe from wildfires this year.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, there you are again. You said "my questioning of what you claimed". That isn't self reflection. If you aren't asking in bad faith, you need to spend more time on your wording.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The downvotes are because it seemed that you were asking in bad faith. You said "I believe it is true", but now you say (admit) that you were questioning it.

The attraction of Linux is precisely that it isn't one of the two 'standards'. Your working environment doesn't get determined by some product manager in a far-away office, who has a set of target users in mind, which he's given fictional names, biographies and mugshots.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you think that these might be some of the subpar dwellings that they're talking about: https://southamericabackpacker.com/exploring-slums-of-medellin-colombia/ ?

No, I'm not serious. Of course they don't need roofs or windows or multiple storeys. I'm just joking about that stuff.

view more: next ›