[…], from that point the app will be built by f-droid with their own digital signature.
This part of your comment is not quite true. One of the advantages of reproducible builds is that the app can be signed by the developer but fdroid can still verify that it has been built from the correct source code. You can check out the documentation here: https://f-droid.org/docs/Reproducible_Builds/
Cool but seems very unrelated?
Wouldn't that hurt Russia as much as any other country?
Happy Fairphone 4 user here! 🙂
Though I've heared mixed things about the FP5...
linked to Chinese speaking groups
What is that even supposed to mean?
Space cadet has been reverse engineered and can be installed in Linux through flatpak: https://flathub.org/apps/com.github.k4zmu2a.spacecadetpinball
I use ntfy and have no problems. It's very reliable. No idea about graphene though
Kagi supports this since a while. You can end your query with a question mark to request a "quick answer" generated using an llm, complete with sources and citations. It's surprisingly accurate and useful!
You're probably experiencing the "59 second bug", which has been around for a couple of weeks. Restarting the app usually helps, at least for me.
Have you tried Material Files (it's on fdroid)? It's genuinely great and it supports different remote protocols, although I haven't personally tried this feature.
If an app doesn't support reproducible builds, the version you can download from F-Droid was built and signed by F-Droid, not by the dev