kippinitreal

joined 1 year ago
[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That is a good point, but I think I'd like to make the distinction of saying LLM's or "generic model" is a garbage concept, which require power & water rivaling a small country to produce incorrect results.

Neural networks in general that can (cheaply) learn on their own for a specific task could be huge! But there's no big money in that, since its not a consolidated general purpose product tech bros can flog to average consumers.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (4 children)

That's an excellent point! Why oh why would a tech bro start a non-profit? Its always been PR.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 161 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

Putting my tin foil hat on... Sam Altman knows the AI train might be slowing down soon.

The OpenAI brand is the most valuable part of the company right now, since the models from Google, Anthropic, etc. can beat or match what ChatGPT is, but they aren't taking off coz they aren't as cool as OpenAI.

The business models to train & run models is not sustainable. If there is any money to be made it is NOW, while the speculation is highest. The nonprofit is just getting in the way.

This could be wishful thinking coz fuck corporate AI, but no one can deny AI is in a speculative bubble.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Fixed & noted. Thanks!

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 86 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

They greedy af. They've lobbied (bribed?) to keep the corp taxes as low as possible. Then they go Double Irish with Dutch Sandwich and NOT pay the low taxes anyways. If we were to tax them appropriately then it'd be a helluva lot more than 13b imo

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fair point. Like if you took an still from a movie, they'd attack the actors in it.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I wonder if the anonymous nature of memes could "shield" authors making images of Mohammad? How would you track them down? Would be even more difficult on federated instances/ActivityPub.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't Google's lighthouse have a metric for that? "Colour Contrast ratio" or something?

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I think a great example of what 343 should have done is treyarch taking over COD from infinity ward. They've converted infinity ward's COD into a behemoth. They maintained what worked. They knew living upto IW's standards wouldn't work. They split the COD brand up to MW, BlackOps & the World War stuff, to mitigate any creative risks they could now take. This allowed them to grow COD including going into newer platform & modes e.g. Warzone.

I know it's not an apples to apples comparison, but it does show how management of a studio is as important as the creative vision. 343 clearly lacked both.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If I had to guess why it didn't have split screen was the open world. My guess it streaming assets from two different places on a huge map was costly to do twice (memory wise). Atleast when it was designed/launched.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

~~Valid~~ *Public

Sorry, I think I chose the wrong word, I mean Public i.e., not conspiratorial.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Absolutely, this change makes it harder for people to quickly scroll away ads at the top & for ad blockers to seamlessly hide ads. With ad blockers your first page will be mostly empty & make google more annoying to use.

view more: next ›