hunter2

joined 1 year ago
[–] hunter2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not well versed on the speed of Grover's over classical brute force. According to NIST this is correct! Thanks for the addition.

[–] hunter2@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quantum computers are nowhere near usable for breaking classical cryptography at the moment, though opinions on how soon it will come vary. As others have said, we have quantum resistant algorithms ready to go, so future encryption is fine.

The greater concern is that a lot of traffic and data encrypted using classical algorithms has been logged or stored in various mediums. An old encrypted drive, or communications stored by nation state actors (the NSA and such). These will be broken, and a lot of past secrets might come out from hiding.

[–] hunter2@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Sort of. It's a real expression (at least in England :P) meaning a "must-have" book, usually related to some subject/profession. For example, I'd consider Everyday Cryptography by Keith Martin the cryptographer's Bible. Even after going through it all, it's helpful for reference.

[–] hunter2@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Hashbrowns - McCain is tasteless in comparison