I don’t completely agree. It’s very possible to want to beat a person, but never want to harm an animal. Although… it could be a red flag that needs some consideration.
cynthorpe
joined 1 month ago
I think in the case of animal adoption, the only relevant criminal check would be for animal abuse. Anything else is irrelevant, and could prevent a person who needs companionship from having that therapeutic comfort.
Or mao the fucking thing and make it affordable housing.
Fucking handouts? Screw you. Sell it and someone will make it better or figure out how to make it profitable
I think maybe they are trying to say that even the Democrats aren’t super left in Kansas. However because of the political loss, I would say that’s not necessarily true – at least the voters
Marvin Robinson, a Democrat from Kansas City known for frequently siding with Republicans on key issues
Wonder if they even knew they had been breached
No, I think you just got a jerk employee. It’s rare at Costco, but maybe they were having a bad day.
Still, not illegal. However, the murder should be… and it is often not.
Jd is a moron, but he didn’t storm anything. Get better sources. This was covered elsewhere.
You hire a bunch of dumb brutal apes. Feed them, and provide them with things to kill and rape.
No one is above anything. A person could be a loving spouse and wonderful parent and still beat their animal.
Personally, I hold animals in higher regard than people. If a person bit me, I’d bite back.