curioushom

joined 1 year ago
[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, Gitea is a hard-fork of Gogs and started years ago. Forgejo is a soft-fork of Gitea when the primary authors of Gitea created a company of the same name to provide paid support (there's history there you can look up) but Gitea remains free and open source. Forgejo, supported by Codeberg, is a community fork and will upstream to Gitea.

Gitea/Forgejo is a great option, they recently even added build actions which are compatible with Github Actions.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Racknerd.com has their Black Friday deals page still active and I've had good experience with their shared hosting and support!

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would recommend Tailscale for connecting to the home network. You could run it on each box if running it on the router is wonky.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Just to clarify the entire Logseq app is open source including the sync mechanism, the server backend to receive the sync endpoint and store the data isn't. I use Syncthing (FOSS and cross platform) to sync noted between my devices.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

The comments here have been the most measured and useful about this topic, glad you got great information that others can benefit from now.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Missing an image?!

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Quick example in straight C would be a cell in a matrix. The first pointer points to the row and the second pointer points to the cell in that row. This is am over simplification.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

I would recommend looking into Syncthing. I use it on all my devices and share specific folders between devices (notes mostly) and all folders back to the server. The server then backs all that up offsite as well.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

After reading that post and the linked github issues, with the latest updates and comments from the last 24 hours. Here's the TL;DR:

  • This is only relevant if you want to use an email client with Proton Bridge.
  • If you're just using Proton for encryption and signing (you can use the same PGP outside of proton too) then there is no issue at all.
  • If you want an external tool (like a hardware yubikey) to decrypt your messages that someone else has sent to you using the public key that corresponds to the external tool there will be signature validation shenanigans. This is because Proton expects to be the only entity doing any encryption.This is an important issue for those that need to send encrypted emails (and signatures) with specific keys.
  • It is not an issue for anyone using Proton email for a secure email service even if they want to use an external email client on desktop (like Thunderbird) with Proton Bridge.

Please correct me if I missed something.

CC: @howlingecko@sh.itjust.works

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Right? The zip ties even have trimmed tails!

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Re: port-forwarding, I used traefik as a reverse proxy and that worked well (having a single domain cert instead of per service DNS is another layer but it's just obfuscation), but it's always a risk. I finally started using Tailscale after hearing about it for years and it is actually very good and deserves the hype. I had meant to setup wireguard myself but this is a lot easier. And if you don't want to use tailscale server, you can run headscale (on a cheap VPS?) instead.

view more: next ›