cacheson

joined 3 months ago
[–] cacheson@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

One time pads or bust motherfuckers.

Not sure if you're being facetious, but one time pads are for encryption, not authentication. They're also impractical (and overkill) for most purposes.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's fair.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd been wondering if we had a community like this. Joined.

You might want to consider limiting cryptocurrency-related posts in some way, so that the community doesn't end up taken over by them in the future. The profit motive makes things weird there. Blockchains are a pretty inefficient, brute-force solution to decentralization too. I'm pro-Bitcoin, but I actively avoid any other project that involves a blockchain. I know there's a lot of others that feel the same way.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

You're not wrong, but I was about to drop it due to how slow it was. I decided to give it one more episode, and that was the one that got interesting. xD

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yep, I love Steins;Gate. I rank Erased higher because it's "all killer no filler", while SG has a bit of a slow start. They're very close though.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Erased is my favorite anime of all time. I'm a sucker for both time travel and "big damn heroes" stuff.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Apparently -tan became a thing because -chan was originally a cutesy baby-talk version of -san, but it got adopted into everyday language and wasn't cutesy enough anymore.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Wait, we already did this with Internet Explorer! Do we really have to feel sympathy for Windows 11 now too? >_<

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Like I said, they have to maintain their own patch to make that work, which needs to be updated for each new Lemmy version. It's not something that mainline Lemmy will do.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

then I really will not get into it.

Bet.

If this is your idea of being "sex positive" then I really do not want to get into this argument. I can guess this will quickly play out to any objection as "pearl clutching" and I will stick to the point that your attitude is completely dehumanizing and that there is nothing "positive" about reducing sex to the mechanical/physical act.

DEHUMANIZING? Seriously? I guess you actually are a SWERF. You clearly have no claim to the label "sex positive". Why would you even want to identify as such?

The view I expressed here is consistent with how sex workers view themselves. Sex work is work. They're just doing a job. They don't want to be "rescued" by moralizing radfems. They want more pay and better working conditions, the same as most workers.

Like I said in the first comment, if you feel so strongly about this, go ahead and create your own and see how far it goes. When you start putting some Skin In The Game you will get more credibility or at least accept that things are Just Not That Simple.

And as I've said, I'm definitely interested in doing that. If you know of any IT people that want to work on such a project, send them my way. I've got experience with programming, leadership, and community building to bring to the table.

Given your attitude regarding (more than just performative) sex positivity though, I'm not sure why you're egging me on here.

[–] cacheson@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You lamented the fact that unlogged users can not see it and that they can not be found as easily. This is the same as "make it available to the public without any type of check".

Behold! (nsfw) - no login required, just an "are you 18+?" prompt, which is pretty standard. You can also search for NSFW communities without logging in. If you're being more moralistic about this than Reddit is, you're probably taking it too far.

Sexuality != Porn

Porn ∈ Sexuality. Also, I intentionally used a broader term here, because what I'm advocating for is expansive, not restricted to just porn. For example, I miss r/bdsmcommunity and r/sex, which are discussion-only. However, you don't get those kinds of communities growing in a place as structurally and culturally prudish as the threadiverse.

"toxicity" is dose-dependent.

Yeah, porn is about on par with video games in that regard. Yet we (rightly) don't suppress gaming communities here.

You don't see young people destroying their lives because they were promised they could make a lot of money by knitting sweaters or working as electricians, but cases of vulnerable women who regret getting into sex work are infinite.

C'mon, don't get all SWERFy on me now. That regret is a direct result of (drum roll)... sex negative culture! (And capitalist labor exploitation.)

"If you think sex workers 'sell their bodies,' but coal miners do not, your view of labor is clouded by your moralistic view of sexuality."

Look, I want a world in which, to the extent that jobs continue to be a thing, acting in commercial porn is just as normal and unremarkable as any other job, and people don't get all judgy about it. Same (hopefully robust) labor protections too. We don't get to there without abandoning pearl-clutching attitudes towards the resulting product, among other things.

view more: ‹ prev next ›