bucho

joined 1 year ago
[–] bucho@lemmy.one 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love this guy's channel. Two of my other favorite things he's done are: Uppest Case / Lowest Case, and that time he Reverse Emulated a NES.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... Ok, fair. 11,000 years was the wrong cut-off date. 12 - 13,000 years would have illustrated my point better.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even anywhere near that long. There have been humans for probably more than 200,000 years. Probably more. It gets confusing when you go back that far. But our written history only accounts for maybe 10,000 of those years. So 5% of total human history, if we take the minimum estimate of what it takes for us to be human. We have no evidence to support the fact that human advancement even lasts as long as written history. I mean, shit... the Romans had central heating and cement, and then they died out and we forgot how to do those things for 1,000 years. Our knowledge, and the acquisition of same is not exactly linear. Lots of fits and starts over the course of the various human civilizations that have occurred.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What happened 11,000 years ago? I mean, we've got some pottery fragments. Other than that, ???

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Depends on your definition of "long-term". The biggest accomplishments of Man have been acknowledged for maybe 10,000 years at the very extreme limits. 10,000 years is not even a drop in the bucket of geological or celestial time. So it very much depends on your perspective.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Incredible.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'Cause I'm drunk on a Thursday (Friday very early in the morning), and I've lost control of my life.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Shit - I love "Commandos". Such a rad game.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

MLA format would be something like this:

Maneuver, The Picard. The Delusion. Picard, 2023.

Then, in your paper, to reference it, just write "(Maneuver 2023)".

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

... Or you could just read a history book that wasn't written by a Mao fanboi.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

I love this book! I first read it, I don't know, maybe 20 years ago, back when Pargrin (he went by David Wong then) posted one chapter of it at a time on his website. A few years after he got it published, Don Coscarelli (director; does mostly indie movies including the "Phantasm" series) read the book, flipped out about it, and decided to buy the rights to the story and make it into a movie. It's a pretty great adaptation, too! I'd rate it as mostly faithful to the source material. It's got Paul Giamatti, Clancy Brown, and Doug Jones in it.

Anyway, if you like JDATE, you should check out Coscarelli's movie of the same name. And also read the rest of the books in the series (book 4 was published about a year ago). And if you like the movie, you should also check out another Coscarelli classic, "Bubba Ho-Tep", starring Bruce Campbell as Elvis.

[–] bucho@lemmy.one 43 points 1 year ago

Translation: Bjørn Gulden is putting out feelers to see if Kanye is still universally hated for his antisemitic comments so he can decide whether it would be a good business decision to reinstate the Yeezy line.

 

So I'm gearing up to take a calculus 1 exam, and this question is on the sample test. My initial thought was that since we are looking for F(9), and F(x) is an antiderivative of f(x), I can just use the integral of the equation of f(x) at 9, which is f(x) = -2x/3 + 5, which, when integrated, becomes -x^2/3 + 5x + 2 (C = 2 because F(0) = 2). Thing is, though, that won't give me any of the answers listed. And even after taking the integral of all of the equations of f(x), I still have no idea how to produce any of the answers in the multiple choice.

I'm super stumped on this one. Any help would be welcome!

view more: next ›