bitfucker

joined 7 months ago
[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing comes to mind. DRM literally means digital rights management and unless you wanted to be petty, like blocking a certain person from using your app, then DRM for something free is not something that I can think of a use case for.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Enforcing payment comes to mind without resorting to in-app purchase or any account creation. A lot of desktop software is a good example of those. Sure, you can still have cracks and whatnot, but then again, that's not the point. Might as well ask what is the point of Denuvo. That is a whole other discussion.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, that's my point. Android "doesn't" have to use Google Play Store, but it is convenient. Other store fronts exist like F-droid and many vendor specific one. Google just provide the DRM mechanism like steam does provide DRM via steamworks

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What I mean by that is, this is just an API/SDK for app developers to use. Google does not enforce the use of such things. Much like steam does not force the use of their drm for example (please note the difference between the marketplace and the drm). App developers can always choose how they make and distribute their app.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Ehh, this is basically just another form of DRM. No different than you having a Steam and GOG model. You can make your apps using DRM and enforce certain constraints

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago

Sometimes you just can't guess the domain name of a company you know. Also, it doesn't help that most companies website are fucking nightmare to navigate so having the relevant page on the first click is nice too

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, remember the news when one of those fucker even continue the procedure despite the patient SCREAMING in pain and he just doesn't care?

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hmmm, yeah it gets harder to associate it with physical reality when user generated content is introduced. Maybe an archival of said content is mandated but then again, who is going to serve the archive. In the case of youtube, it would be almost impossible

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Huh, the difference is that a website is not akin to a public park but privately owned park with or without entrance fee. The owner is nice enough to open the park and let you do whatever you want for free with the cleaning and maintenance is paid by the owner, but when the park is closed, would you still say the owner should still be forced to maintain it?

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The transport is usually TCP/IP tho. But nowadays QUIC is trying to make it UDP. HTTP is specifically an Application Layer Protocol from OSI model

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

The thing is, it does exists a way to convert grpc protobuf to json one

view more: ‹ prev next ›