arcterus

joined 2 years ago
[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

Shopping online locally or just finding certain items? It's not great locally because it doesn't seem to use your location for searches (which is good IMO), but it's usually been fine for me if I'm just looking for something I want to buy. Note that you need to tune the results for them to be good (you can adjust site rankings for yourself).

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like Kagi, after tuning, provides the best results at the moment (even including Google sometimes). You definitely need to tune it though since the default results are not that great. Agree about their CEO. TBH, at this point, I also wish they weren't based in the US.

It's been a few years since I last tried Searx, but I remember the results being pretty bad. Has it gotten better?

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I looked into this a while back and came to the conclusion that the dev didn't seem trustworthy. Also, just looking on the homepage, the images it showed me were a dildo with "4get" stuck on it using a sticky note and a modified manga panel about beating women. Not sure I'd want to use something like that in public.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

Your original comment said: "Also a lot decided to not vote at all. That’s really what sank us."

Clearly, the popular vote is not what sank us. The one trying to argue something different so you'd win the argument is you.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Whose votes lead to the EC results? Americans. The arbitrary distinction you are trying to make here is ridiculous.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, obv state and local elections are very important as well, although in some cases even those elections don't really require people to vote due to district composition. Generally, I agree with you though. I was mainly pointing out that the popular vote for the presidential election basically does not matter.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

My entire point was that the popular vote basically does not matter (and tbh shouldn't matter since FPTP is terrible, although the EC is also terrible), so you saying that Trump being elected because people didn't vote isn't necessarily the issue here. Even if literally everyone in the country voted, as long as the states ended up the same way, Trump would still have won.

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

This is not strictly true, even if it's repeated a lot. Because of our voting system, a large number of people likely didn't vote because they didn't need to vote. For instance, you pretty much know how things will end up in California or Idaho even before the votes are tallied. People who didn't vote in swing states on the other hand...