Thanks for the confirmation
Well what ground news wants to do -critical evaluation and media literacy- is so vital.
But ground news deciding on what exact position on the spectrum a source is, seems to achieve the exact oposite: make people depentend in questioning and finding a variety of sources.
Nowadays everything needs to happen in an instant.
If theres a solution that only takes half a snap, that will be the only relevant choice for the mass. Thats why Im instantly asking, because just today I referred to this source to someone else as a might-be-bad example but instantly realized, I will have to ask this on the next situation (now)
Anyways thanks for the correction!
but I thought big corpo is there to create jobs!
maybe as European im not too well versed in US sources and judged too harsh based on anecdotal experience. All the news Ive seen are always on the "nothing has been said" or "thats reaching" side.
my bad then
sorry for derailing a little:
why is there multiple links to choose from as a source? What exactly created that choosable format - are they automated, is this some system like groundnews or something?
EDIT: Seems to be only on some interfaces. I see it on the photon interface for feddit.org but I dont see that on the base fedditorg
If only we'd put those things in front of tree groups near highways, that somehow still exist
is newsweek considered a serious source? even this objectively right seeming headline is kind of a nothingburger, isnt it?
sorry for derailing. if thats not tolerated, i will stop
we are past 1,5°
this is something that is past my expectations, idk
haha its just like mum's magic powers when youve lost something and already looked in "that place"
on paper.. .checks paper Democratic People's Republic of Korea... checks out
all those images of venezualen immigrants .... being handled like the absolute worst possible being.. its crazy
More Context of me in another post
Not logged in:
Logged in:
Oh wow, theres more to this discussion, nicely useful!
says:
So its kind of in a grey zone, not reliable doesnt mean bad source in that case. Useful link, altough wikipedia is also a grey zone in the sense that its information based on open source (everybody can edit it, and most liked proposals get through as I understand)