Zombiepirate

joined 1 year ago
[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks!

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The real reason is that conservative ideology dictates that society will have winners and losers who end up in the correct spot in the heirarchy if society doesn't interfere with the natural sorting.

So it follows that homeless people don't deserve a "handout" or a leg-up just because they squandered their opportunities.

Leftists think that an ideology follows from a moral interrogation of the world as it should be, whereas reactionaries think the highest good is done by ensuring that people are in their correct spot in the heirarchy in relation to others; since some people are inevitably going to be homeless, there isn't much to be done about it and the leftists complaining about it are just virtue signaling to get votes.

Their justification is irrelevant once you realize the actual ideological reasoning.

Edit: I'm confused by the downvotes. Anyone want to tell me how I'm wrong? This isn't my ideology, but I think it's useful to understand your opposition on more than a cartoon-villain level, especially since they are so effective at selling their ideas to low-information voters.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I've been promoted and the company still had to post the job publicly for a couple weeks to satisfy internal protocol. It's insanity.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 64 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ok, maybe if you're dying you can get the healthcare treatment that you need.

If you can find a doctor/hospital who will open themselves up to litigation and if you can get there. But you'd better be on the cusp of death!

Are we not merciful?!?

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

You're a satirical genius! Can I have your autograph? I've never seen such a good impression of a rabid Muskrat before.

I'd love to see your material on sovereign citizens next; their delusions are even more fun IMO.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but Jesus would have smacked the shit out of Paul, too. It's kind of been that way since the beginning of the religion.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused about what part is against her religion:

  • calling kids by their name?
  • not being a bigot?
  • not making everything about her?

Regardless, we know whose religious rights will be protected by the SCOTUS most high: the one who is imposing her ignorant worldview upon a captive audience. Funny how believing in magic gets you extra rights in this country.