Weirdfish

joined 1 year ago
[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but bland as the last one was, can you imagine Vance doing the right thing and certifying the election after the shit show on Jan 6th?

I may not be a Pence fan, but he earned a ton of respect from me that day.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many cars have this with the touch screen, sport mode, eco mode, etc. Some will even learn from your driving behaviour and calibrate to that.

The change is functionally instant, and when the original post talked about mapping it's really a bunch of graphs and curves that dictate behaviour over the full range of rpm of the engine. You can switch maps on the fly by loading different basically spread sheets into the computer. Factory cars are calibrated for general use and epa standards, but you could make all kinds of special settings for various conditions.

My knowledge of this is dated, haven't been in the industry since 2000, but the basics haven't changed.

Older Porsches had a physical button on the floor under the gas pedal that you'd trigger when you floored it, putting it in spaz mode.

The truth is, how you drive has a bigger impact on fuel efficiency than anything else, don't accelerate aggressively, and stay below 65 mph. Wind drag above 50 mph is by far the greatest impact on fuel efficiency. Internal combustion engines are generally most efficient between 1800 and 2500 rpm, so if you keep your cruising speed there you'll get the longest range on road trips, but obviously it'll take that much longer.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It can't do both at the same time.

By remapping I assume you mean changing the ECU (engine control unit) programming.

Depending on what all it controls, usually fuel injectors and ignition, and what it reads, air pressure, rpm, oxygen, throttle input, the mapping adjusts timing of ignition, and how much fuel is injected based on how fast the engine is spinning, and where the throttle is set.

Most cars from the factory have a very simple mapping based around what most drivers do.

A fancy prototype CRX I had back in the 90s had very custom mapping that meant when I drove mellow, it got about 45 mpg, but had very slow acceleration. If I pushed the throttle past a certian point, it spun up like a bat out of hell, but the fuel economy would plummet.

What you can do with custom mapping is change the way the engine behaves under various conditions and based on the inputs. There is no magic get more out of the engine. Want more power? Eat more fuel and lose economy, and likely not burn off all the fuel so more dirty exhaust. Want more range? Limit power and lose acceleration.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well, it's not like RDR2 had a short story, so I'm ok with that.

I suspect they want enough of a solo game to not piss off us old guys, then will quickly pivot to GTA6 online for the cash cow.

If the world and AI are good, I'll have endless hours causing chaos and jumping motorcycles.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have had my S8 galaxy since release, and now various apps won't work on the OS. I'm being forced into buying a new phone at this point.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

I've gotten it in two flavors.

One is people who are so convinced that life has no meaning without children they feel like they are saving you by pressuring you to have kids.

The other, and far more angry, seem to have had kids because they thought they had too, or had a "happy accident", and aren't actually happy about. They see you as the life they could have had.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I have a few times in life, but I've always found a new one.

Each time I'd get deep enough into something, tech advancements always made that thing functionally obsolete.

Once again I'm watching my skill set being phased out, but am working on my big last hurrah project right now that I've dreamed of for years. Having a great time doing it, but have already started the process of replacing it over the next 18 months.

The one plus side now is that the company I'm with has already invested in my training for the next big thing. I've been through it enough times that I don't feel like I'm losing something or wasted my time.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The pace of change is about every five years, and some elements are always in transition.

All in one turn key solutions are always one to two cycles behind, so may work great with the stuff I'm already replacing.

I think these are honest attempts to simplify, but by the time they have it sorted its obsolete. If I have to build modules anyway to work with new equipemnt, might as well just write all the code in my native language.

These also tend to be attempts at all in one devices, requiring you to use devices only compatible with those subsystems. I want to be able to use best tech from what ever manufacturer. New and fancy almost always means a command line interface, which again means coding.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

20 years ago at a trade show, a new module based visual coding tool was introduced in my field which claimed "You'll never need another programmer".

Oddly enough, I still have a job.

The tools have gotten better, but I still write code every day because procedural programming is still the best way to do things.

It is just now reaching the point that we can do some small to medium scale projects with plug and play systems, but only with very specific equipment and configurations.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is my solution. I've said it before, but think it should be repeated. The global population was half of today's when I was born. 4 billion instead of the current 8+ billion.

That means if half the population disappeared today, we'd just be back where we were in 1975.

Not having kids is the best thing I can do for both the environment, and myself.

Has the added benifit of leaving me as a passive observer who doesn't have a biological need to care about the future.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This was my first thought, one of my favorite series.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I went into one of the larger local shops to buy some risers or something to try and adjust my old setup. Older sales guy about my age took one look at my gear and said "Your knees must hurt like hell".

I had the money, so I just went full in on new gear, and came away with something I would never have picked for myself.

Not only did he size everything proper for me, he made sure all the pieces were right together. For the first time in my life toe and heel line up exactly with the edge, and where they belong on the pressure points. I'd always riden too small a board and had far too wide a stance to make up for it.

I was still skeptical, but he told me if I didn't love it he'd do a full price exchange.

Even though it's about the longest board I've ever had, the banana camber makes it feel half the size. Took about three runs to actually trust the board, and I was completely sold, you couldn't pay me to ride the old gear again.

view more: next ›