UnH1ng3d

joined 11 months ago
[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are you able to see what kernel version it's running?

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for pointing it out πŸ˜‚

 

I just saw a post complaining about the Mozilla layoffs.

I wanted to point out that the vast majority of their income (over 85% in 2022) is from having Google as the default search engine - Ironically, the anti monopoly lawsuit against Google will end this.

Expect things to get worse.

Please don't assume it was just a cruel choice.

S1 S2

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

😈😈 Finally an advantage to using rEFInd 😈😈

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Thanks. I'm still learning how Lemmy works πŸ˜…

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (21 children)
[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can you give some examples πŸ˜…

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 88 points 4 months ago

I've read the "learn more" bit now and I'm going to leave it switched on. (although I use uBlock anyway β€πŸ˜…)

I think this is a legitimate attempt to 'fix' the internet. It seems only very basic information on interactions with ads is recorded by the browser, and then it is anonymised. As an example, the advertiser should only receive counts of how many people bought a product after seeing a particular ad. I don't think they can see what webpage anyone in particular came from, but maybe they can see that: 11% percentage of visitors came from example.com/some-page

Presumably the anonymised data is only provided once the pool is fairly large and wouldn't show 100% of visitors came from cornhub when you only had one visitor πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Obviously websites will always see an IP address.

The idea is for this to substitute for traditional, more invasive, tracking. I think it may one day achieve that.

A warning though: I only just started reading about this.

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Excuse me while I go and click that 'learn more' button...

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I've had the same thing. I think orca's retraction test is just too 'easy'. I think the towers are too far apart.

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A ghost πŸ‘»

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't trust what you can't see.

[–] UnH1ng3d@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This was it! I had my 10-25% (not degrees πŸ˜…) overhang speed set not to slow down at all. I now have it set to 30mm/s and I have a perfect result. Thank you πŸ‘πŸ˜

 

When I do an overhang test, I always have this problem at about 35Β°. Does anyone have a suggestion what could be causing it?

  • Slicer: Orca
  • Layer height: 0.2mm
  • Infill: 0% (this has improved it a lot, I think the infill was causing bulging)
  • Outer walls: 2
  • Overhang speed: 10 or 20mm/s (both look the same)

Solution: I mistakenly thought overhang speed in Orca was based on overhang angle, it is percentage instead (which makes much more sense for different layer heights). My 10-25% overhang speed wasn't set to slow down and that must translate to about 35Β° at 0.2mm layer height. I now have it set to 30mm/s and it now looks great πŸ‘ And sorry, I was wrong when I stated the overhang speed πŸ˜…

 

I use rEFInd as my boot manager and sometimes I like to dual boot a new linux distro (just to try out) which I install with a live USB. Unfortunately, after installing, GRUB has always taken the reigns and it becomes a slight inconvenience to get back to rEFInd every time.

Is there some trick that can request grub not to install?

[What prompted me to ask was I tried KaOS yesterday, and during installation it asked what bootloader i wanted and included the option for 'none'.]

view more: next β€Ί