TheMetaleek

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Continuing a deep rock galactic addiction, and used the sales to start sea of thieves with some mates, having a blast for the moment!

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I don't agree but I like the meme, upvoted!

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The diapsid part is very likely indeed, as fossil skulls of early stem turtles do show some temporal openings ( https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-024746 ) The point is more where do they nest within Diapsida, more closely to the Lepidosauromorpha, or to the Archosauromorpha, and where precisely if within one of those clades. The point is that can't quite be proven using only extant species, whether by DNA or morphological evidence. And concerning ML, the methodology is often criticised, not because it's bad, but because it's opaque and thus it is difficult to justify and understand as a process

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

In phylogeny, genomic is just another tool. The point is that turtles are os course animals, but they do branch off of different reptile groups if you look at morphological evidence (which includes fossil data) or at molecular (genetic) evidence (which only includes extant species). This is not something frequent, as usually molecular evidence tends to strengthen previous morphologically established evolutionary relationships. And even though molecularists are more numerous today, their methods are neither better or worse than anatomy.

Phylogeny is not as straightforward as some people make it seem, and especially molecular phylogeny tends to rely on abstract concepts that can't always be backed up by biological evidence (I'm not saying it's wrong, it's very often very good, juste that a lot of people doing it do not understand the way it works, and thus can't examine the process critically).

And so turtles' origin are still very much an active debate!

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I feel inappropriate near all the very universal questions here, but as a paleontologist specialised in some reptilian groups, the question would probably be "where the fuck do turtles come from?!" The thing is that fossil evidence points to different answers when compared to genetic evidence, and thez separated long enough from other extant groups that we keep on having new "definitive" answers every year

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Not sure if it qualifies as nihilistic, but Upgrade (2018) definetely has a very unhappy ending

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only in the souls like niche, but Iron Pineapple covers a lot of often unknown indie games in his series of steam dumpster diving (don't be fooled by the name, a lot of the games are good)

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Actually, a LOT of studies do show that no, in most countries, taxes are far from enough to cover the cost of tobacco induced diseases.

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you do that, then you should also forfeit your right to use publicly funded hospitals that already struggle enough with people suffering of conditions they did not ask for voluntarily. Smoking is not just a cost for your body, but for society as a whole, hence the justification in a ban

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Not too much techy, paleontologist here