StrayCatFrump

joined 1 year ago
[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Wow! Will do. Thanks.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Supposedly Revolt is FOSS and is similar to Discord. I haven't tried it yet, though.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Have you tried Revolt? It's supposed to FOSS and offer similar functionality to Discord. I keep meaning to try it, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

ledger because I love to know about my money

Nice. I've been putting off for some time trying to find something better than GnuCash or buckling down and writing my own. This looks perfect.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

jq for parsing/formatting/manipulating JSON, and its yq wrapper for YAML. Holy shit you can do powerful queries with them.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She's a racist, classist noeliberal and a fucking cop (or close enough).

Her political career has been chock-full of attacking public institutions like schools, protecting white-collar crime which destroyed countless lives, protecting child molesters in the church, implementing policy against the poor, and protecting prison slavery. I'm not sure where exactly the confusion lies.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Irrelevant. See above.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I was under the mistaken impression that we were talking about billions of humans. But I see now that you have forgotten about them because you are only interested in Meta, and not the actual humans using meta.

Those billions of humans can still be free to come use the Fediverse through non-Meta instances. Nobody's forgetting about them; just rejecting Meta's ability to exploit those people as they interact with our platforms and infrastructure. You are attempting to co-opt the language of inclusivity here. Not cool.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed. I think it's more that we have been fooled on a superficial level into thinking that online interactions have filled the void (we're on "social media" after all). So we still recognize that there's something profound missing from our lives, but what that thing actually is has become kind of obfuscated. The dilemma then becomes whether to 1. blame technology, or 2. blame ourselves individually ("there must just be something wrong with me"). And either way it leads away from the radical solution of rebuilding those local, deep connections with our communities.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think it's both that and not having real community ties. We don't form close associations with each other like back when we had town events, neighborhood gatherings, people belonged to more clubs, recreational groups, labor unions, etc.

I wonder if there was an attempt to ask people about television, too.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We’d probably be willing to view ads if the experience wasn’t literally jarring.

Not me, sorry. Fuck ads. I've been ad-free for like a decade, and I'm not interested in regressing.

[–] StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm. Hate to be a downer, but that sounds like there needs to be a way for the service itself to block (ban) users and material, not for users to be able to block other users. So I wouldn't be too optimistic about Apple's response....

view more: next ›