Snapz

joined 1 year ago
[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

Good. Now, extending this logic, if I have ZERO WATCH HISTORY of shorts videos on my account, then... STOP CLOGGING MY SUBSCRIPTION FEED WITH SHORTS!!!!!!!!!

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Anyone have an idea of how much of this is "the EPA" versus vestiges of the virus that trump/pruit were as they purposefully broke agencies like this? How much of that poison remains in the org today?

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh man... this takes me back.

My grandpa used to always say to us kids, "I'm going to go upstairs to have sex with your grandmother".

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can someone please explain telemetry to me in this context? Is telemetry just a broad umbrella term for usage data or does it indicate a specific type of data or category of data?

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Of course there are degrees of usefulness and different types of organizing, but generally, your wrong here in your first point. Some merit in your second claim, but overall, it's something they likely feared to a degree as a point of connection and amplification of information.

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

He needs daddy's approval and the other billionaires are surrogate daddy. That would be the social agenda influence you're referencing. Look at how desperate and odd he was on stage with dave chapelle, that was a core view into his base self, he needs to be praised. He's also a eugenics/natalism cult member and sees the wealthy as his equal, superior "race" of people - so he would 100% sacrifice a lot for even their passing approval.

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wallow looks interesting, how is it on battery use though?

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had anyone here switched to this from pocket casts? Anything you miss, did you go back?

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago

ACAB

All Chromes Are Bastards

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

No it isn't.

No... No it's not... But you can imagine what'd be like if it was, right?

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure they are bad, because general corporation and enshittification cycle, but when someone consistently mentions, "a single tweet" or something like that that they represent as purely innocuous (but without any explanation or link to source), gets my suspicious radar WAY up...

[–] Snapz@beehaw.org 55 points 1 year ago (14 children)

On purpose.

Only clearer by the day that this was all an exercise to intentionally kill Twitter to the benefit of billionaires, fascists and other extremists.

Twitter existed as a relatively free and open public space to communicate, organize and assemble to take actions for and against things at scale before musk (e.g. The Arab Spring, a terrifying moment for the Saudis especially - the second largest shareholder behind musk).

When people collectively laughed at elon and his cringe, inbred, emerald boy antics or his humiliating divorce and other routine failures, Twitter was the bullhorn.

Now elon and his desperate far right Toadies will work to try to rewrite reality so they can eventually have this conversation:

"Twitter? What's a Twitter? Wait, are you talking about blork? A bird? No, blork's logo is a dinosaur with chainsaw arms... and everyone wants to be his best friend... and it's against the law to divorce him... and he's cool... and..."

What an everlasting tool history will remember you as, elon. If they remember you at all, it will be to laugh at you - you'll never outrun that.

view more: next ›