SkyeStarfall

joined 1 year ago
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Where is the border between acceptable and not acceptable lifestyle? The animals can't consent. If you beat your wife, is that also an individual lifestyle we have to respect? What if you neglect and beat your pets, for a closer example? What if your individual lifestyle is dumping trash into the ocean?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In theory? Yes. That's the point. All I'm saying is that it's not literally impossible, why is it so hard to understand?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well, here we need to specify what "artificial" in this equation means. Because to me it just means "created by humans" (so, not natural processes). It doesn't say anything about it not being able to be near-identical to natural brains

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes, absolutely. Because at a minimum we can recreate the human brain, as we know the human brain can exist.

I want more complex games though

Definitively not, this is something that tends to occur at low skill levels in MOBAs, but gets better at higher levels as people figure out how to actually play the strategic layer

I've lost plenty of lanes but came back in the midgame, there's a lot to do throughout the game, early, middle, and late. It's also about your team being able to adapt to the circumstances and execute the correct strategy at the right time taking into account the situation for your team

And people struggling to do this is just a natural part of a competitive game, really. And sure, snowballing is a thing, but so are comebacks.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The question wasn't whether it's inevitable, but whether it's possible

And the answer to whether it's possible is a clear: Yes, because we already have general intelligence

But it's very much not an inevitability, no. Civilization could always collapse before we get to that point, after all

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

That the human brain exists is enough evidence that intelligence is possible. An AGI similar to the human brain is then possible at a minimum

Can't say much more than that for sure, but you have a starting point.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe you just don't like MOBAs, to me it's one of the most promising upcoming pvp games, but I am someone who likes MOBAs and shooters

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's less effort and typically more realistic (in the sense that it looks more real, not that it is)

But it's unethical either way, don't make non-consensual porn

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The most annoying thing since the rise of LLMs is that everyone thinks that all of AI is just LLMs

Classification machine learning models can also be neural networks, which is something that was called AI also

As far as I could tell, it was never intended to be a serious quote, especially because the person saying this was the literal villain that was being portrayed as not sane

view more: ‹ prev next ›