Skiluros

joined 5 months ago
[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I strongly disagree. I am only happy for people to be the best version of themselves and to feel comfortable in their skin.

Changes in legal or morphological sex is not relevant. This is not what we are discussing.

I already mentioned that there are edge cases. Edge cases do not discredit foundational frameworks that define reality.

The bio-chemistry of terrestrial life is built upon a binary sex framework. This has been true for hundreds of millions of years. There is no such things as a triple helix or quadruple helix in terms of reproduction. Even trees and plants have a binary sex.

You claim that this is something I want to be true. I would argue the same (on a vice versa basis) for you and that you're framing the discussion using irrelevant examples (how is a morphological change in sex even relevant to what we are discussing).

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's far closer to a binary distribution than a bi-modal distribution. You can be pedantic, but that's not a real arguement. I admitted there are edge cases.

This is not tied to pure outcomes and is derived from actual earth bio-chemistry.

There is no triple helix or quadruple helix as a foundational system of genetic bio-chemical reproduction.

When you flip a coin, there is a chance that it will land on the side, yet we still use a coin flip for a 50:50 probability scenario because it is close enough.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

With all due respect, sex is not a spectrum.

It's a clearly a binary. Yes, there are many exceptions and edge cases, but they are all based around a universal binary biological structure.

You don't have say three distinct sexes required for reproduction outside of sci-fi. It is a binary with some edge cases and variations in how exactly the two parts of the binary interact.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

and don’t get me started back in the days when every fandom had a dozen sites which all hated each other for vague and extremely personal reasons.

Oh man, this brings me back.

Remember the time in the late 90s and early 2000s when even a niche topics had like 3-4 large community sites with active forums. More popular topics could easily have like 10-20 communities.

And there was a lot of drama both within and between communities.

It's kind sad that we lost this, although lemmy is a solid modern alternative, just needs much more users. Enough users for even niche topics to have multiple active communities with their own spin/focus on a given topics.

On the plus side, I am glad I got to experience the early pre-corporate internet. It was good times.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is some super fucked up shit.

Americans, you'll need make sacrifices and deal with very difficult and scary choices if you want to deal with this and everything else that is happening in your country. Freedom isn't a mere polemic.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you are not American, this is the sort of thing that shows that American society more broadly is unreliable and hypocritical.

All the polemics about "free speech!!!" are complete bullshit.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I am not getting involved in the discussion around "boycotting capitalism", but you can definitely find pretty solid options for smartphones and computers (desktops, desktop components, laptops) if you go second hand. This is true of almost any country in the world (in some places with lower salaries, 2nd hand will still be somewhat expensive, but I digress).

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Fascinating stuff. You can't really fight back against a criminal, oligarch regime if you're not interested in upholding the rule of law and are open to working with oligarchs.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Economic liberalism did away with the divine right of kings and rule by bloodlines. Replacing it with something ultimately, arguably worse.

Come on, man! The serfs/peasants/slaves had it way worse than anyone living under "economic liberalism". There is no comparison! Not even close.

I will agree that zero tolerance policies oligarchs (all well as senior associates, propagandists and enablers) does benefit everyone.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Her foreign policy and her statesmanship on the other hand was widely respected.

FWIW, in Ukraine (and many other parts of Europe), her foreign policy w.r.t russia is seen as de-facto enabling russian genocidal imperialism (as a conscious and pre-mediated decision). She nurtured and enabled putin every step of the way.

I am of course not speaking for German public, since I've never lived in Germany.

view more: next ›