9
I'm always look forward to Uytae's videos but since his last few topics seems to have driven legislative changes I really wonder what he'll tackle next.
For anyone out of the loop: https://youtube.com/@abouthere
I saw a quite a few comments about how NDP and Green voters were somehow the bad guys in the by election but the Liberals seem more than happy to let the Conservatives run Canada into the ground for 4 years and somehow they've done a "good job".
One of these categories seem very out of place for a conversation about national inflation.
Some of the increase was typical of the season. Prices for cellular services, rent, travel tours and air transportation grew at a faster pace, according to the data agency.
America is ramping up their production again and it will very likely be part of the trade agreements to be supportive their endeavor which leave us once again in a rather awkward position.
I'd like to think a competent government would be able to take advantage from both the American and Chinese subsidies, but I have feeling we lose out on the cheap decent Chinese cars while finding ourselves on the losing end of a North American trade agreement.
Technically speaking we need a lot more infrastructure as whole. Housing being the most dire one.
I'm actually starting to feel like Trudeau actually thought a ahead on this one politically and really setting up Pierre to fail.
It's my belief that the guy is trying to be so embarrassing that he sweeps this video under the rug.
90
Just to make things easier for people.
The video talks about the glut of micro units having issues selling due to how undesirable they are for people actually living in them and not aligning with a more realistic price.
The numbers on why a lot of people can't hold onto these investments:
Shrinking units, the ones discussed in the video is around ~300sqft:
Substantially less of newer units are owner occupied:
22
Rentership Ranks on the Rise: Canadian Cities With Highest Shares of Renters
(www.point2homes.com)
Missed rent payments could soon damage your credit score — and tenants’ advocates are very concerned
Credit bureaus are testing the inclusion of rent payments in credit scores, saying it’s a positive move launched by Ottawa.
Translation: The 2 private companies that monopolize peoples credit ratings says they're very happy that the federal government pushed even more business and influence their way.
For anyone wondering. If you wish to make a complaint, contact your provincial or territorial consumer affairs office. The federal government doesn’t regulate credit bureaus.
The article heavily leans on Ontario and what doesn't work.
If anyone wondering how things are going for a province the adopted a payment system less focused on volume.
700 more family physicians in B.C. since payment revamp: doctors
It's amazing that a 7 billion dollar company goes to court to fight someone for $800. Aside from obviously being in the wrong.
...awarding $650.88 in damages for negligent misrepresentation.
$36.14 in pre-judgment interest and $125 in fees
"Hodgins says he was offered a C$2,000 flight voucher by the airline, but said compensation would not “fix the problem” of how the airline failed its disabled passengers."
Given how much this seems to be happening I'd be for fining any airline that does this 100k. Half for the victims and half for disability advocacy groups.
Microsoft's pay guidelines for job offers:
Level 70:
Base pay: $231,700 to $361,500
On-hire stock awards: $310,000 default to $1.2 million with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $945,000
Level 69:
Base pay: $202,400 to $316,000
On-hire stock awards: $235,000 default to $1.1 million with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $750,000
Level 68:
Base pay: $186,200 to $291,000
On-hire stock awards: $177,000 default to $1 million with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $490,600
Level 67:
Base pay: $171,600 to $258,200
On-hire stock awards: $168,000 default to $700,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $336,000
Level 66:
Base pay: $157,300 to $236,300
On-hire stock awards: $75,000 default to $600,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $160,000
Level 65:
Base pay: $144,600 to $216,600
On-hire stock awards: $36,000 default to $300,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $90,000
Level 64:
Base pay: $125,000 to $187,700
On-hire stock awards: $24,000 default to $250,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $60,000
Level 63:
Base pay: $113,900 to $171,500
On-hire stock awards: $17,000 default to $200,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $44,000
Level 62:
Base pay: $103,700 to $156,400
On-hire stock awards: $11,000 default to $125,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $32,000
Level 61:
Base pay: $92,600 to $138,100
On-hire stock awards: $6,500 default to $75,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $24,000
Level 60:
Base pay: $83,500 to $125,000
On-hire stock awards: $4,500 default to $50,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $16,000
Level 59:
Base pay: $74,400 to $110,800
On-hire stock awards: $3,000 default to $30,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: $0 to $12,000
Level 58:
Base pay: $70,300 to $92,600
On-hire stock awards: $2,500 default to $20,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 57:
Base pay: $63,800 to $83,000
On-hire stock awards: $1,500 default to $10,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 56:
Base pay: $60,700 to $77,900
On-hire stock awards: $1,500 default to $10,000 with approval
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 55:
Base pay: $55,200 to $71,300
On-hire stock awards: N/A
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 54:
Base pay: $51,600 to $67,000
On-hire stock awards: N/A
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 53:
Base pay: $46,600 to $59,700
On-hire stock awards: N/A
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
Level 52:
Base pay: $42,500 to $54,600
On-hire stock awards: N/A
Annual stock award range: "By career stage"
view more: next ›
SamuelRJankis
joined 1 year ago
Theoretically yes but it also encompasses a number of different design changes.
These are his videos talking about it:
How Breaking Rules Could Create Better Apartments - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=011TOfugais
Why North America Can't Build Nice Apartments (because of one rule) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRdwXQb7CfM