Pirata

joined 1 week ago
[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 51 minutes ago

I agree with you thoroughly.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

I did, but what you said is incorrect.

Not giving away your data isn't encouraged and I challenge you to point out where in the law does that say. It would be stupid to even include such a passage because it would be a blatant attack on the advertising industry and the EU is a neoliberal pro-capitalist institution that wants businesses to operate inside the bloc.

And I say it again, this is a niche community, but a lot of people like targeted advertising.

I know, because I hate advertising and I preach to everyone around me that they should just reject all tracking and some have told me "but I want to see relevant ads. If I have to see ads they might as well be relevant to me." which is a totally fair point.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

and if it could be sent to third parties then only with the user’s consent.

You literally said it. Apple removes this option.

Why are you even upset? Its not like you're being forced to allow your data to be transmitted. The GDPR wants a standardised way of choosing which apps can track you and which don't, and Apple is out of the norm. You're just upset because the EU is forcing apple to standardise, is that it? Were you also upset when the EU forced apple to adopt USB-C too? You're literally complaining about having more choice.

Also, I cannot shake off the feeling that everyone in this sub is just shilling allowing a massive US conglomerate to exploit all digital ad revenue on EU soil, while local smaller companies get jack.

It would be like some EU car manufacturer selling electric cars in the US that van only be charged using proprietary chargers from the EU. Surely consumers would be upset at the lack of choice, and with reason.

Or maybe not. After all, tesla was allowed to do just that for a very long time. In any case, the EU is opening business opportunities (or rather, re-opening them) by shutting down a monopolistic practice that harms competition. The US refuses to make use of their antitrust laws, so we have to do it for you. You're welcome.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It didn't pass. Its just, they keep trying to push for it, but thankfully some countries are still shutting it down.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago) (1 children)

My opinion on the matter is irrelevant, I'm just explaining what the case is about.

The advertising industry is real, and will keep existing, whether you like it or not. And yes, having the option to be an informed consumer and choose who gets to track you is a net positive. Some people LIKE targeted ads.

Plus, it's not like Apple was protecting you from ads so I don't know what your point even is? You're defending them having a monopoly on who gets to advertise to you, and that, on EU soil, won't do.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee -3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes they did. Its a new precedent set based on anticompetitive practices. Shouldn't be hard to understand.

I know the US is a full blown oligarchy where a few men are allowed to control everything, but the EU actually has some standards.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago

I'm fairy sure the guy above said "use X" not use social media. X is a particularly shitty platform.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee -1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (7 children)

No. The GDPR is an all encompassing law, the logic of which being giving people THE CHOICE to let apps personalise their ads, or not. Apple takes away that choice by not allowing tracking by default on a per-app basis. This is what is at stake.

What Apple is doing is indeed disrespecting the spirit of the law by taking away the choice of being tracked, while also damaging EU businesses who rely on advertising because believe it or not, there are many small app creators as well as small advertising companies operating in the EU.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

I don't lose sleep over having to add "reddit" or "forum" at the end of my search query.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 6 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

Its not the EUs fault that US companies keep breaking the law. Don't break the law, don't get fined. It really is simple. EU companies aren't getting these fines.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Do you know how SearXNG works? It literally pulls search results from whatever other SEs you define it should pull from. You just get to reap the perks of all engines, without having to deal with their antagonistic design.

Who pays for all of it in the end? The people who still want to use Google's service and feed their all-reaching tentacles. But that is their choice.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's the thing about Sear. You can customise it how you want and that's it. No need to let some corpo be in control of what and how you see your results.

20
Disable DMs? (lemm.ee)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Pirata@lemm.ee to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
 

Is there a way to disable DMs? I keep being spammed by users from an instance called sh.itjust.works promoting some weird out-of-platform personal profiles.

They usually send this stuff and then immediately seem to get banned, but I still see their stuff since images are displayed by default. Seems like a big oversight to allow this.

Is there a way to block receiving DMs? Or at least have some sort of Accept/Decline dm feature like on Reddit?

34
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Pirata@lemm.ee to c/boostforlemmy@lemmy.world
 

Pretty please. I got used to using it on the other platform that shall not be named, and now I can't live without it.

It's free, helps low vision readers and can be downloaded directly from the Braile Institute.

view more: next ›